- Jan 21, 2013
- 17,107
- 30,920
K I give up, you're not understanding at all.
I wasn’t aware that you tried explaining it to me. Apologies.
K I give up, you're not understanding at all.
Stop digging! It is not everything you can share in public! Will not repeat all what I have already stated. No dissecting neededYou were earlier and you still are. Insisting that we don’t have any ITK which is conflicting when there clearly is. We have one ITK saying it’s down to injury and nothing else and another who’s said there’s more to it than just the injury.
So which one is it?
I wasn’t aware that you tried explaining it to me. Apologies.
Stop digging! It is not everything you can share in public! Will not repeat all what I have already stated. No dissecting needed
I appreciate you can’t share it I’m just pointing out to the almighty tiger that we have 2 ITKs saying different things. Not exactly revolutionary seeing as you’ve both obviously heard something different. By the sounds of it this other thing was more of a factor than his injury concerns
There are diplomatic reasons why we share different pieces. You all need to understand that we cannot compromise our sources. Moreso, we honestly have the best governors on this site, and we abide by the rules. Hopefully you understand now.I appreciate you can’t share it I’m just pointing out to the almighty tiger that we have 2 ITKs saying different things. Not exactly revolutionary seeing as you’ve both obviously heard something different. By the sounds of it this other thing was more of a factor than his injury concerns
This isn't the I love Sissoko thread.
Sissoko wouldn't have played given a fit squad, as has been backed by ITK as late as the last few hours.Knowing that Poch values Sissoko and thinks he's an important part of the team structure isn't the same as "loving Sissoko".
It just means you have eyes, a brain and can keep your sanity rather than acting like silly children having tantrums and blaming Sissoko rather than understanding a very simple gameplan.
@Hercules Thanks for your info, mighty Hercs- please don't get too annoyed with the more needy of usStop digging! It is not everything you can share in public! Will not repeat all what I have already stated. No dissecting needed
Love it - turning down Barkley on medical grounds in order to wait to sign Bale!!! Ha ha!Last summer Breezer mentioned that we were going to try and bring back Bale at the end of this season. Hercules has now mentioned that we've secured a signing for the summer instead of Barkley and that Breezer knows why we can't talk about it now. I think we can all see what's going on here. Breezer and Hercules are talking to each other about something!!
This isn't the I love Sissoko thread.
Stop digging! It is not everything you can share in public! Will not repeat all what I have already stated. No dissecting needed
I understand the other reason cannot be divulged, but I can't let it go.
I guess we'll see next window how it turns out.
But right now I really disappointed. And I really hope Poch is not mad about it like we are
Love it - turning down Barkley on medical grounds in order to wait to sign Bale!!! Ha ha!
Listen up!!!
STOP slagging off the club regarding RB! I wanted it to happen. There is more than one reason (medical) we pulled out. Sissoko WAS Poch’s signing! End of!
I am fully confident that Poch will be backed 100%! Why? Because if they don’t you know the consequences. I would strongly advise everyone to stop knocking Josh, before we loose him. He has access to this forum through his friends. He is not on it, but hears. If we are not careful he will go.
I will not divulge beyond what I have done who our targets are, or who is in the bag. 2 definitely are. If names come out in media etc, I may rethink that.
Keep friggin backing Tripps over KWP, if you
To confirm: this isn't any sort of Sissoko thread.
Then we really are fuckedAccording some members in the thread, selling sissoko is the necessary condition for us to buy ...