What's new

Fernando Llorente

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
I wouldn't be so sure.



Who's to say Sterling can't be that guy? We've failed nearly every time we've signed a striker (since Defoe, probably - or Dempsey if you count him as a striker) - we might as well stick to bringing them through our youth.

He might not be ready but at least we should give him a try and see if he can do it. With strikers you never really know until they are given a go.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,025
32,757
He has been useless because we don't play to his strengths. Don't get me wrong I'm happy if he leaves but only if we replace him
This imo is bollocks, every time we've crossed to him he's either fluffed his lines or hasn't shown any desire to get on the end of a cross.

It seems like we're not because he's not doing anything but we do put in a fair amount of crosses every game.

Janssen was actually better in the air than Llorente.
 

Dan Stallworthy

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2017
249
628
This imo is bollocks, every time we've crossed to him he's either fluffed his lines or hasn't shown any desire to get on the end of a cross.

It seems like we're not because he's not doing anything but we do put in a fair amount of crosses every game.

Janssen was actually better in the air than Llorente.

And that IMO is bollocks. I have not seen him fluff many chances from crosses, in fact i haven't seen many effective crosses to Llorente at all. But each to there own
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,180
79,748
This imo is bollocks, every time we've crossed to him he's either fluffed his lines or hasn't shown any desire to get on the end of a cross.

It seems like we're not because he's not doing anything but we do put in a fair amount of crosses every game.

Janssen was actually better in the air than Llorente.
He certainly hasn't done himself any favours which is strange because he does seem to be a good character off the pitch. He's not fit for purpose, however he hasn't really made the most out of the moments he did have. I'm okay with him going with NO replacement coming in as long as that money is used to secure Malcom, Sessegnon or another one of our main targets. We aren't going to abandon the way we play, so get rid of those who don't suit and bring in some who do.

I wouldn't be opposed to a replacement coming in now either. But please, NO SQUARE PEGS!
 

Joeyboey

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2011
1,806
5,260
And that IMO is bollocks. I have not seen him fluff many chances from crosses, in fact i haven't seen many effective crosses to Llorente at all. But each to there own

Away vs Leicester comes to mind !!!!

Regardless of whether we play to his strengths or not he's been ineffective and a disappointment so far.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,180
79,748
And that IMO is bollocks. I have not seen him fluff many chances from crosses, in fact i haven't seen many effective crosses to Llorente at all. But each to there own
Barnsley, Madrid, and I can't remember the game but he fluffed a header from 6 yards out against the bar. You can't say it's bollocks.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,025
32,757
And that IMO is bollocks. I have not seen him fluff many chances from crosses, in fact i haven't seen many effective crosses to Llorente at all. But each to there own
OK but think about Kane from crosses. He's deadly isn't he?

Think about why that is. It can't be because we don't cross the ball when Kane's on the pitch. It's because Kane is aware at all times, he works his nuts off, he moves cleverly and has a burning desire to score goals.

Llorente may be good if he does manage to get his head on a cross, but most of the time he doesn't because he ambles around inside the box. If you compare his and Kane's movement you will see a world of difference in work rate and desire.

A header is a two way street. Yes it does require a cross but it also requires a striker to work hard to find the space and be aggressive.
 
Last edited:

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,180
79,748
OK but think about Kane from crosses. He's deadly isn't he?

Think about why that is. It can't be because we don't cross the ball when Kane's on the pitch. It's because Kane is aware at all times, he's works his nuts off, he moves cleverly and has a burning desire to score goals.

Llorente may be good if he does manage to get his head on a cross, but most of the time he doesn't because he ambles around inside the box most of the time. If you compare him and Kane's movement you will see a world of difference in work rate and desire.

A header is a two way street. Yes it does require a cross but it also requires a striker to work hard to find the space and be aggressive.
I've always felt Llorente has a bit of the 'Berbatovs', in the respect that he has to really want it for it to happen. Whereas Kane is always wanting it.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,146
46,140
It's what a lot of people have been saying for hours yet some are adamant we need a pure striker to waste away on the bench, which I don't agree on at all.

It’s all fine until someone gets injured.
 

Dan Stallworthy

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2017
249
628
I agree to an extent, but i think mainly from set peices is the problem. We all know eriksens corners are below par, even his free kicks have gone downhill. I remember the sitter he missed, but Kane also missed a sitter of a header, against Newport
 

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,273
21,771
If Moura is confirmed then we can play Son up top if needed and switch Eriksen to left.

Llorente just doesn't fill me with any confidence, shame as I thought he might have done a decent job when we signed him.

It really has been difficult getting another forward in as they know who they're competing against, it would be good if we looked to maybe blood likes of Sterling from youth side when possible (like in league cup where we missed a trick).
 

MarkyP

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2008
555
955
I fully expect us to have strengthened one area of the squad in signing Moura, only to weaken another area of the squad (injuries prevailing) in selling Llorente and not replacing him... regardless of Son being able to cover Kane up top if needed.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,684
104,964
I don't buy the batshuayi rumours. He went to Chelsea over us because they offered him higher wages. Why would we suddenly make ourselves look weak and offer him what he is getting there or higher?
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,334
9,703
If Moura is confirmed then we can play Son up top if needed and switch Eriksen to left.

Llorente just doesn't fill me with any confidence, shame as I thought he might have done a decent job when we signed him.

It really has been difficult getting another forward in as they know who they're competing against, it would be good if we looked to maybe blood likes of Sterling from youth side when possible (like in league cup where we missed a trick).
Superb - we can have Moura and Eriksen on the wings pinging in the crosses onto Son’s head. :rolleyes:
 

Dan Stallworthy

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2017
249
628
We're supposed be challenging for top 4, competing in domestic cups and the UCL, we need depth 100% it would make no sense to lose and attacker and not replace him IMO
 

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,273
21,771
Superb - we can have Moura and Eriksen on the wings pinging in the crosses onto Son’s head. :rolleyes:

Does Eriksen usually hog the touchline and ping crosses in then?

And isn't Moura and inverted wide player (a left-footer who players on the right) so I hardly see him as a pinging in crosses old fashioned winger type.
 

samspurs92

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2010
2,105
7,482
Does Eriksen usually hog the touchline and ping crosses in then?

And isn't Moura and inverted wide player (a left-footer who players on the right) so I hardly see him as a pinging in crosses old fashioned winger type.

Moura is right footed and plays on the right.
 
Top