Kane was offside according to how Ive always understood the rule
1. it doesnt matter that it came off a Liverpool player last
2. he was definitely "interfering with an opponent" in this case the keeper
doesnt matter since he missed the pen so quit whining you dumb scousers.
https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_11_offside_en_47383.pdf
Kane was offside according to how Ive always understood the rule
1. it doesnt matter that it came off a Liverpool player last
2. he was definitely "interfering with an opponent" in this case the keeper
doesnt matter since he missed the pen so quit whining you dumb scousers.
https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_11_offside_en_47383.pdf
If we didn't get the penalty I'd have like to have seen retrospective action taken against Can for his attempt to con the referee in to believing Lovren didn't get a touch on the ball.
Kane was offside according to how Ive always understood the rule
1. it doesnt matter that it came off a Liverpool player last
2. he was definitely "interfering with an opponent" in this case the keeper
doesnt matter since he missed the pen so quit whining you dumb scousers.
https://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/refereeing/law_11_offside_en_47383.pdf
I disagree. The ball came off 2 pool players! The forward ball was simply a forward pass which was deflected by 2 pool players. The pass was for lamela. The second it had taken 2 touches from pool players it was effectively free ball.
Hard for me to explain clearly.
Just image....
1. A left back has the ball in the oppositions half and he looks to switch play from left to right....he strikes the ball (for somebody who is on the other side of pitch onside).
2. He hits the ball but as it becomes airborne it his an opposition player on tbe head and the ball changes direction and loops over his own teams defence.
3. There happens to be a striker there (who was offside when the attempted switch of play took place) who suddenly has a through ball to latch onto.
Should he be offside? No.
Ive not helped matters have i.
Thought Souness was spot on. He put Redknapp in his place, as per usual.The pundits are Carragher, Souness and that absolute mong Jamie Redknapp! Might as well sit there with their Liverpool shirts on! Carragher and Souness are good when the subject isn’t Liverpool related. Redknapp jnr is absolutely stealing a living, he’s a complete idiot who offers nothing
Kane was offside according to how Ive always understood the rule
1. it doesnt matter that it came off a Liverpool player last
2. he was definitely "interfering with an opponent" in this case the keeper
Great post, spot on.It does matter. The defender deliberately played the ball and it was not a save.
Lovern deliberately played the ball. The fact that he played the ball poorly does not mean he gets bailed out by the offside flag.
A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who
deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is
not considered to have gained an advantage.
interfering with an opponent by:
• preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
• challenging an opponent for the ball or
• clearly attempting to play a ball which is close to him when this action impacts on an opponent or
• making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
At the moment in the image above, he is not preventing an opponent from playing the ball nor is he obstructing the keepers line of vision.
He is not challenging an opponent for the ball. Kane standing in that position is not a challenge for the ball.
He is not attempting to play the ball (yet). This is tougher to convince you of because you probably think "of course he's attempting to play the ball here". But what IFAB means by attempt to play or challenge for the ball means making a move towards the ball or being shoulder to shoulder with the defender in an attempt to win the ball.
He's not making an obvious action to impact the opponent from playing the ball. Kane standing there is not an obvious action. The defender chooses to play the ball here. Yes he is probably playing the ball because Kane is there, but then you require the referee to be able to read the mind of a defender and ask why they played the ball. IFAB/FIFA has said since 2012 (or so) that a player standing in an offside position is not enough to say that they impacted an opponent from playing the ball. They need to actually challenge the defender or prevent them from playing the ball to be judged to have interfered with them.
I know some fans don't like it. I know "back in my day" that this was offside. It's not anymore and it hasn't been for five or six years. The law was changed in an attempt to promote more attacking and open football. If you disagree with the rule, ask yourself this. Why should the defender be rewarded for making a mistake and misplaying the ball?
Eriksen using his jedi powers.
It does matter. The defender deliberately played the ball and it was not a save.
Lovern deliberately played the ball. The fact that he played the ball poorly does not mean he gets bailed out by the offside flag.
A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who
deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is
not considered to have gained an advantage.
interfering with an opponent by:
• preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
• challenging an opponent for the ball or
• clearly attempting to play a ball which is close to him when this action impacts on an opponent or
• making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
At the moment in the image above, he is not preventing an opponent from playing the ball nor is he obstructing the keepers line of vision.
He is not challenging an opponent for the ball. Kane standing in that position is not a challenge for the ball.
He is not attempting to play the ball (yet). This is tougher to convince you of because you probably think "of course he's attempting to play the ball here". But what IFAB means by attempt to play or challenge for the ball means making a move towards the ball or being shoulder to shoulder with the defender in an attempt to win the ball.
He's not making an obvious action to impact the opponent from playing the ball. Kane standing there is not an obvious action. The defender chooses to play the ball here. Yes he is probably playing the ball because Kane is there, but then you require the referee to be able to read the mind of a defender and ask why they played the ball. IFAB/FIFA has said since 2012 (or so) that a player standing in an offside position is not enough to say that they impacted an opponent from playing the ball. They need to actually challenge the defender or prevent them from playing the ball to be judged to have interfered with them.
I know some fans don't like it. I know "back in my day" that this was offside. It's not anymore and it hasn't been for five or six years. The law was changed in an attempt to promote more attacking and open football. If you disagree with the rule, ask yourself this. Why should the defender be rewarded for making a mistake and misplaying the ball?
He said it when he was at Basel. Roughly the same time we played them in Europe I think.Can't find any quotes from Salah about us.
Everyone might reasonably have thought that Kane was offside for the first penalty. It was only well after the final whistle that we found out what the big debate was about: Lovren touched the ball on the way through to Kane, playing him onside.
I don't think anyone should be "blamed" for Salah's second goal. You don't "blame" defenders when Messi scores one of those and this was in that class.
yeah, I just saw the new rule about deliberate play from a defender, so no offside. had the ball simply deflected to Kane his subsequent actions would have counted as "playing the ball" and it would have been whistled.
but its academic because he missed the pen.
He said it when he was at Basel. Roughly the same time we played them in Europe I think.
Eriksen using his jedi powers.
"I'm not sure he touched the ball."
"Well, he touched the ball!"
"Penalty."