- May 11, 2008
- 16,387
- 52,880
wtf? there's a difference between semantics and actually saying you did something you didn't do.
It's amazing how people can turn a thread into an argument on the basis of arguing the toss over things they've not read correctly.
Take my post:
and then change the [admittedly incorrect, hence my concession of the semantic argument] "that I quoted" wording to "that I was [clearly] referring to", and you have the correct semantics for what I intended to say. The thrust of which isn't changed at all. You dimwit.I don't recall the @PeeEyeEmPee post that I quoted saying we were going to finish 6th.
edit: and now going on a neg-rep rampage
Sorry, will retract my Winner rating above if you like?