- Jan 28, 2011
- 5,696
- 79,442
Yarmolenka out for season.
That's gutting for the player, but West Ham surely have enough to cope without him, don't they? Let's see...
Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
Yarmolenka out for season.
That's gutting for the player, but West Ham surely have enough to cope without him, don't they? Let's see...
Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
That's the Ferraro Rocher of pie charts. Hopefully we'll be spoilt rotten by West Ham's shite results.
So you've sacked off your old rivals because they're below you
You've invented a new rivalry
Your captain has talked the game up with BS about 'similar starts'
The game is at home
The game is straight after an international break when your captain and most of the team have had a nice two-week rest. Conversely, the vast majority of your rivals played twice, including their star striker who was already knackered.
Several other players in your rivals' team are also knackered, having not had a proper rest after the World Cup
Your rivals are missing their main defender who was in Team of the Season last year. Your rivals are also missing two England internationals and have four international players on the bench, because none of them are fit enough to play 90 minutes.
Your rivals struggled to beat one of the worst teams in the league in their last fixture
You spent nigh on £100m on new players in the close season. Your rivals spent fuck all.
The referee has a perfect view of a red card offence by one of your players and doesn't even give a foul.
Despite all this, you still lose 1-0.
So what do you do?
You go back to your old rivals...
A tweet from yesterday ..
I'm not sure what he means by restraining himself - maybe a 'not bending her over' jobby ?
@Lilbaz
You gotta help me out here - I don't know what said that stirred your juices.
Going to be a sleepless night here in Four Acre, Ballyfrory elsewise.
I get real ocd when I see a phone with battery in the red!
I get real ocd when I see a phone with battery in the red!
Its fucking reckless, you need to be stopped.Haha I did think that.
Its fucking reckless, you need to be stopped.
If I knew you I'd arrange an intervention.
Before we got involved West Ham were taking over the place. We were encouraged to bid to reduce their leverage then Levy made it so West Ham had to rent instead of own it and that the running track has to remain for 99 years.
If that is broken, Levy’s lawyers will be all over it ASAP.
Our bid was always the most sensible yet it was laughed off. Levy ensured that West Ham’s plans for the stadium were ripped up and at best, put on hold for a generation at least.
They’ll be in a different stadium within 15-20 years imo. Possibly further out in to white van land.
oh I'm not calling it a white elephant. its in all of West Ham's talk, they talk about how the staidum would have been a white elephant had they not stepped in and done the country a massive favour by taking it on!White elephant?
Explain to me how a 35k seater is a white elephant. Who refers to Crystal Palace as a white elephant?
It's the fans I feel sorry for.Pity for him but i'm sure the £millions in the bank and super model girlfriend will cheer him up.
I guess Levy could claim it is state aid which is against EU rules.People keep saying this but on what grounds could Levy sue them? Yes his idea to knock it down and build a football stadium, then build a more sensibly sized athletics facility at Crystal Palace was a much beter idea than what they've gone with in the end, but as far as I'm aware having a proposal turned down in favour of another plan that turns out to be worse isn't any kind of grounds for a legal case is it?
I accept that the whole deal with West Ham absolutely reeks either of virtually criminal incompetence or just outright corruption (especially Seb Coe's links to the redevelopment of the site in CP) but what does any of that have to do with Levy and what would he actually be suing them for?