- Jul 5, 2016
- 9,401
- 23,735
The press guy shushing questions makes me suspect Poch's head might have been turned a little.
You could spin that in a multitude of ways.
The way I chose to spin it was...Dharmesh...shut the fu*K up you ballbag.
The press guy shushing questions makes me suspect Poch's head might have been turned a little.
You could spin that in a multitude of ways.
https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/21/jami...otspur-bigger-club-manchester-united-8272813/
For me some good points. Discuss
He is Bitter - we finish above his shitty club Lolipool nearly every year.
Shit stadium and doggy part of country.
For what it's worth he's right that Poch owes us nothing and should he go, I will not begrudge the man.
It's utterly ridiculous. If united want Klopp - should he go?
If we don’t nip it in the bud then every press conference will be littered with speculation. That will be the only thing that causes distraction and limits our ability to get our message across.The press guy shushing questions makes me suspect Poch's head might have been turned a little.
I think ex-professional football players provide an excellent insight into some aspects of the game, particularly dressing room behaviours, player morale and their experiences of managers and tactics. But most ex-pros are pretty limited in their actual footballing knowledge beyond their personal experience.https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/21/jami...otspur-bigger-club-manchester-united-8272813/
For me some good points. Discuss
If we don’t nip it in the bud then every press conference will be littered with speculation. That will be the only thing that causes distraction and limits our ability to get our message across.
The press office did the right thing
Pochettino's urged Spurs' supporters to have more faith in his and the club's decisions, saying that greater belief among the fanbase would make Spurs stronger. He also says the media are largely responsible for negative perceptions.
Absolutely, been saying for ages our fans need to man the fuck up and stop creating negative scenarios in their heads as a defence mechanism.
They would have to buy out poch contract.
8.5m x4 = £34m
There's no way that's right because that wouldn't compensate the club in any way. I'm pretty sure that, unless there's some pre-arranged clause, that the club the manager is under contract with is able to demand whatever compensation they want in theory. At the end of the day they're under no obligation to release the manager from their contract.
The speculation won't stop regardless.
It does compensate the club as they would be getting paid the money for the contract.There's no way that's right because that wouldn't compensate the club in any way. I'm pretty sure that, unless there's some pre-arranged clause, that the club the manager is under contract with is able to demand whatever compensation they want in theory. At the end of the day they're under no obligation to release the manager from their contract.
I think it is about correct. It's contract law at the end of the day, right?There's no way that's right because that wouldn't compensate the club in any way. I'm pretty sure that, unless there's some pre-arranged clause, that the club the manager is under contract with is able to demand whatever compensation they want in theory. At the end of the day they're under no obligation to release the manager from their contract.
I think it is about correct. It's contract law at the end of the day, right?
If Poch decided he no longer wanted to work for Spurs we have no way to force him to turn up every day and give his best. It's an employment contract not a certificate of ownership. If employer and employee are really at loggerheads the case would go to arbitration where the general outcome is that the employee can escape their contract if they pay the employer the remaining value of it. The idea is that the employer can take that money and hire somebody else to fill the role.
Any compensation paid on top of that would be there to grease the wheels.
In theory Spurs could force him to see out his contract (I think, maybe some human rights stuff there) but it wouldn't be good for us to have an employee in that position who isn't really trying. So that's where the compensation fee really comes in... that extra bit of "sorry" for the disruption it would cause.