What's new

The price is too high

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
I like watching football.
I love watching Spurs.
I don't do banter down the pub
with Spurs fans
or watch the pundits on the TV.
I'm very old by the way.
I have been saying what spud said
for some time and on my blog.
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/3259273396080016599/6035128593499377419.
the last one called 'Ticket to Ride was on this very theme
and the Ticket Collector is not me by the way.
Trophies should be the result
of playing well consistently.
Perhaps if we win the Carabao this year
(a bye and 2 cushy draws and single leg semi
so it probably won't count)
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/3259273396080016599/232217296544549882?hl=en-GB
(My blog on this theme)
we can get back to some enjoyable football again
having got the trophy monkey
off our backs.
But don't bet on it.
Well said that (old) man.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,540
48,811
I don’t care.

Three words that I never thought I would say, or even think. But it’s true: I don’t care. What don’t I care about? Whether we win our next game. Whether we win the league. Whether we get into the CL. Whether we win the FA Cup or the Europa League. I never thought it would be possible for it to come to this, but it has.

I’m fairly old. So I’ve been following, supporting and watching Spurs for a long time. I’ve been at Wembley and the Lane when we’ve won trophies; I’ve seen us lose finals and semi-finals. I’ve seen us relegated and promoted. I’ve watched some great players and some shit ones, some good teams and bad ones. But I’ve never seen anything like this season’s Tottenham.

I want to win trophies. It’s embarrassing that we haven’t won anything since 2008 and that we haven’t won the Cup since 1991. It’s obvious to say that a club of our size should be competing for trophies most years and winning them on a fairly regular basis. It’s why Jose Mourinho is our manager. We don’t have to like him. We just have to respect his CV and trust in the idea that he will make our ‘nearly men’ of recent years into winners.

That’s what I did. I’ve never liked him and I don’t like him now. I think he’s a prick. But he’s our prick and we have to get behind him. So I supported his appointment and reasoned that I could put up with ‘Mourinho-ball’ because, as far as winning trophies is concerned, the end justifies the means. All-out attack hasn’t worked. Pragmatism, I told myself, is fine.

Only we aren’t watching pragmatism. Pragmatism is adapting to the prevailing circumstances in order to achieve the desired result. Pragmatism is adjusting how you play depending upon the opponent. In simplistic terms (and as a rule of thumb), pragmatism is attacking teams that are weaker than you and defending against those that are stronger. We aren’t pragmatic.

We have a ‘plan A’. If that isn’t working then……we stay with ‘plan A’. Plan A is simple: don’t concede a goal and rely on our world-class forwards to get one. Then don’t concede a goal. If we concede a goal, don’t panic. Don’t concede another one and hope that our world-class forwards get at least one goal; hopefully more than one. We don’t have any strategy of how to attack apart from ‘get it up to the forwards as fast as possible’.

The reason that I don’t like this is simple: it’s cowardice. We’re scared of losing. We are afraid of trying to win. Our objective is to avoid defeat – preferably with a clean sheet - and hope that we can score one or two more than the opposition.

I remember having a conversation with an Arsenal fan in the days before Wenger took over. He admitted that he wished his club played more attacking football but he justified the fact that they didn’t – the fact that they had been defence-first for as long as anybody could remember – by winning something now and again and never having been relegated. He knew there was a better way – it was three miles down the road – but didn’t want to admit it. That was the way things were. He lived with it.

Are we going to have to live with it? I can’t. If this is the price of winning trophies, then I’m sorry but the price is too high. We’re sacrificing what we are for the promise of a pot or two. We’re selling our soul. We’re abandoning our history because we haven’t won anything for a while. We’re in danger of not being Tottenham any more. Bill Nicholson will be turning in his grave.

I know most of you – if you’ve bothered to read this far – won’t agree. ‘Stupid old bastard’ you’ll say; ‘he’s talking bollocks. It’s all about winning’. Well, yes and no. Of course it’s about winning, but it’s about more than that. I realise it’s a cliché, but I’ll sign off with the famous quote from our famous captain.

"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."

Audere est facere.
The style isn't THAT bad EVERY match, we lack a bit of additional attacking quality and creativity other than Kane and Son if Lo Celso isn't fit. At times when we're 1-0 up we're too passive so I hope we can address that but overall its not a terrible watch week after week and Jose has improved our defence a lot and we're in a cup final. I think give him a bit more time and you'll come around to see a more balanced style. No-one was complaining a few weeks back when we were top of the league.

I get your sentiment though.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,540
48,811
This is the problem though with not having a consistent philosophy. We spent 6 years trying to dominate possession, playing attacking press high football, now we're changing the squad to find the right players for low block, little posession counter attack football. So when josé goes,what do we do? Go back to high press attacking possession football and need to completely turn the squad over again?
True but Chelsea have chopped and changed managers and styles pretty dramatically for the past 10-15 years and win trophies all the time, the key is they’ve had billions of pounds to spend on quality players.

if a new manager came in and wanted up to press higher with possession football and he has players like the following I think he’d be fine and would just need to add a few players to tweak to his style as most mangers need to do when they inherit a new squad:
Regullion, Dier, PEH, GLC, Ndombele, Son, Bergwijn, Kane, pretty sure that core of players would be more than able to adapt to a high pressing possession stye if needed so as long as we keep adding quality players I wouldn’t worry too much mate.
 

walworthyid

David Ginola
Oct 25, 2004
7,059
10,242
I don’t care.

Three words that I never thought I would say, or even think. But it’s true: I don’t care. What don’t I care about? Whether we win our next game. Whether we win the league. Whether we get into the CL. Whether we win the FA Cup or the Europa League. I never thought it would be possible for it to come to this, but it has.

I’m fairly old. So I’ve been following, supporting and watching Spurs for a long time. I’ve been at Wembley and the Lane when we’ve won trophies; I’ve seen us lose finals and semi-finals. I’ve seen us relegated and promoted. I’ve watched some great players and some shit ones, some good teams and bad ones. But I’ve never seen anything like this season’s Tottenham.

I want to win trophies. It’s embarrassing that we haven’t won anything since 2008 and that we haven’t won the Cup since 1991. It’s obvious to say that a club of our size should be competing for trophies most years and winning them on a fairly regular basis. It’s why Jose Mourinho is our manager. We don’t have to like him. We just have to respect his CV and trust in the idea that he will make our ‘nearly men’ of recent years into winners.

That’s what I did. I’ve never liked him and I don’t like him now. I think he’s a prick. But he’s our prick and we have to get behind him. So I supported his appointment and reasoned that I could put up with ‘Mourinho-ball’ because, as far as winning trophies is concerned, the end justifies the means. All-out attack hasn’t worked. Pragmatism, I told myself, is fine.

Only we aren’t watching pragmatism. Pragmatism is adapting to the prevailing circumstances in order to achieve the desired result. Pragmatism is adjusting how you play depending upon the opponent. In simplistic terms (and as a rule of thumb), pragmatism is attacking teams that are weaker than you and defending against those that are stronger. We aren’t pragmatic.

We have a ‘plan A’. If that isn’t working then……we stay with ‘plan A’. Plan A is simple: don’t concede a goal and rely on our world-class forwards to get one. Then don’t concede a goal. If we concede a goal, don’t panic. Don’t concede another one and hope that our world-class forwards get at least one goal; hopefully more than one. We don’t have any strategy of how to attack apart from ‘get it up to the forwards as fast as possible’.

The reason that I don’t like this is simple: it’s cowardice. We’re scared of losing. We are afraid of trying to win. Our objective is to avoid defeat – preferably with a clean sheet - and hope that we can score one or two more than the opposition.

I remember having a conversation with an Arsenal fan in the days before Wenger took over. He admitted that he wished his club played more attacking football but he justified the fact that they didn’t – the fact that they had been defence-first for as long as anybody could remember – by winning something now and again and never having been relegated. He knew there was a better way – it was three miles down the road – but didn’t want to admit it. That was the way things were. He lived with it.

Are we going to have to live with it? I can’t. If this is the price of winning trophies, then I’m sorry but the price is too high. We’re sacrificing what we are for the promise of a pot or two. We’re selling our soul. We’re abandoning our history because we haven’t won anything for a while. We’re in danger of not being Tottenham any more. Bill Nicholson will be turning in his grave.

I know most of you – if you’ve bothered to read this far – won’t agree. ‘Stupid old bastard’ you’ll say; ‘he’s talking bollocks. It’s all about winning’. Well, yes and no. Of course it’s about winning, but it’s about more than that. I realise it’s a cliché, but I’ll sign off with the famous quote from our famous captain.

"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It is nothing of the kind. The game is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."

Audere est facere.
I said virtually the same thing a couple of days ago.

I totally agree. The price is too high.

When was the last time you enjoyed one of our games? Or even looked forward to watching us play?

That says it all for me. Clubs are more than what trophies they win. There is a soul, a heart, a sense of identity. It transcends everything.

I would go 50 tears without a trophy rather than sacrifice our identity for a carling cup!
 

HildoSpur

Likes Erik Lamela, deal with it.
Oct 1, 2005
9,178
28,701
Sorry but I couldnt disagree more - it is totally worth it IF we win something. If we don't then I'm totally on board with this.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,442
84,016
I said virtually the same thing a couple of days ago.

I totally agree. The price is too high.

When was the last time you enjoyed one of our games? Or even looked forward to watching us play?

That says it all for me. Clubs are more than what trophies they win. There is a soul, a heart, a sense of identity. It transcends everything.

I would go 50 tears without a trophy rather than sacrifice our identity for a carling cup!
Problem is this identity was likely correct for a long period but since the Prem started we aren’t seen as the footballing team of England.

Arsenal, Chelsea, West Ham fans and others all consider themselves footballing sides.

I don’t think we should be making managerial decisions based on such a loose identity.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
I was also at that Coventry game, i think was 2000-1 season and we lost 2 - 0?. The atmosphere was toxic and not long after GG was sacked and replaced by Hoddle. The difference between then and now is that the GG team was shite, whereas todays squad with the right tactics, strategy and application has all the ability to be successful and play decent football.
LOL Tell me seriously, if we played like Man City and camped on the other teams box, what will happen when the ball goes to these lot?

Hojberg -- Sissoko

Regullion - Dier - Toby - Doherty

Lloris
Seriously what's the best tactics for these 7 players going forward?

Outside of Reguilon they are crap going on the ball. Hojberg isnt too bad but he keeps it tidy the rest are horrifically bad

Lloris has never been able to kick a ball, Dier and Toby seem to think they're Tom Huddlestone most of the time, Hojberg, Sissoko and Doherty aren't playing well

God forbid Davies starts

Rather than making our pitch bigger, our passing is so SLOW we work ourselves up in to tight spaces and it results in our midfield losing the ball

N'Dombele is trying to be Dembele but times 10 trying to find space but struggling as the pitch becomes way too compact

We are losing to the press, to beat it, you have to move the ball quickly under pressure like the Tiki Taka crap Pep did but our players struggle to pass if an opposition player looks at them funny

I cant stress how shit we are on the ball. We are the worst team on the ball in the top 6 but defending as a unit is keeping us near the top 4 FFS
 

Donki

Has a "Massive Member" Member
May 14, 2007
14,459
18,977
Probably not best to post this when we were playing SU later lol. (y)
 

walworthyid

David Ginola
Oct 25, 2004
7,059
10,242
Sorry but I couldnt disagree more - it is totally worth it IF we win something. If we don't then I'm totally on board with this.
What are we likely to win? The carling Cup? OK, so we beat man City and win it. Then what? How memorable would that honestly be?

Our last 5 seasons under poch have been memorable. Exciting. Amazing. Yet we won nothing.

We won the carling up in 2008 during a very mediocre period. What did it change? Did we challenge to win something else the following season?

Arsenal have won 3 fa cups in the last few years yet their fans are unhappy. Would you swap our time under poch for arsenal's 3 cups over the same period?

I wouldn't. Not for a second.
 

HildoSpur

Likes Erik Lamela, deal with it.
Oct 1, 2005
9,178
28,701
What are we likely to win? The carling Cup? OK, so we beat man City and win it. Then what? How memorable would that honestly be?

Our last 5 seasons under poch have been memorable. Exciting. Amazing. Yet we won nothing.

We won the carling up in 2008 during a very mediocre period. What did it change? Did we challenge to win something else the following season?

Arsenal have won 3 fa cups in the last few years yet their fans are unhappy. Would you swap our time under poch for arsenal's 3 cups over the same period?

I wouldn't. Not for a second.
Are we above winning the league cup now? Are you having a laugh?
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,540
48,811
True but Chelsea have chopped and changed managers and styles pretty dramatically for the past 10-15 years and win trophies all the time, the key is they’ve had billions of pounds to spend on quality players.

if a new manager came in and wanted up to press higher with possession football and he has players like the following I think he’d be fine and would just need to add a few players to tweak to his style as most mangers need to do when they inherit a new squad:
Regullion, Dier, PEH, GLC, Ndombele, Son, Bergwijn, Kane, pretty sure that core of players would be more than able to adapt to a high pressing possession stye if needed so as long as we keep adding quality players I wouldn’t worry too much mate.
To add to this Jose literally just said in the top match presser “top players can play in any team, under and manger or style” so as I said if we recruit top players it won’t be an issue who our next manager is and their preferred style of play.
 

CowInAComa

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
7,293
18,237
There is no correlation between successful football and playing negative football. In fact, in most instances, successful teams are highly entertaining.

There is no price to pay to see Spurs win something and we shouldnt indulge the notion that this is a necessary evil we have to suffer.
 

Geyzer Soze

Fearlessly the idiot faced the crowd
Aug 16, 2010
26,056
63,362
The most i ever enjoyed football was the redknapp years tbh. Won nothing, had no real hope of winning anything, but I loved it

Now.. Meh actually haven't watched a game for more than a year. Follow results only, bite me. Don't like Mourinho, or his brand of football. never have and never will
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,442
84,016
The most i ever enjoyed football was the redknapp years tbh. Won nothing, had no real hope of winning anything, but I loved it

Now.. Meh actually haven't watched a game for more than a year. Follow results only, bite me. Don't like Mourinho, or his brand of football. never have and never will
I think the time under Jol was my favourite. We quickly went from lower mid table to firmly being the 5th best team in the country. He had big plans for running the club from top to bottom and he was great in interviews.

Redknapp's time was also great. I didn't have the same affection for HR as Jol but I rated him as a manager. He gave individuals a platform to shine and we really competed.

Poch also had a great 3-4 years.

But Poch, Jol and Redknapp had their 3-4 years and I have good memories of their time.

Now it is Jose's time to try to bring us success in his own way. He won't be everyone's cup of tea but I don't think he'll be a disaster. In around 3 years time he'll likely be gone. Just enjoy the time best you can safe in the knowledge that few managers have the longevity of a Wenger or Ferguson.
 
Last edited:

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,442
84,016
For a club that hasn't won't a lot we have far too much entitlement in our fan base
People have different opinions.

Lots of fans have great memories of Jol, Redknapp and Poch. If they don't think they'll enjoy Jose as a manager then they should be free to say so.
 

Westmorlandspur

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2013
2,911
4,774
I said virtually the same thing a couple of days ago.

I totally agree. The price is too high.

When was the last time you enjoyed one of our games? Or even looked forward to watching us play?

That says it all for me. Clubs are more than what trophies they win. There is a soul, a heart, a sense of identity. It transcends everything.

I would go 50 tears without a trophy rather than sacrifice our identity for a carling cup!
The fact is that the vast majority of teams never win anything but it doesn’t stop their supporters following them and enjoying the day out most of the time.
I got more pleasure out of that CL run than I did from the last two league cup wins.
You want to remember great games and great players.
Man City have won plenty but they are not the football club they once were. They are merely puppets of a medieval regime.(you can still be sentenced to death by stoning in Abu Dhabi)
 
Top