- Jul 19, 2013
- 1,527
- 5,540
Whilst sometimes it's a case of better the devil you know can apply, there is always the chance that the situation at spurs could improve under new ownership.
After all man city and Chelsea haven't done too bad since their new owners have taken control, certainly it's doubtful they would need to be replaced serving up success on a regular basis.
Not at all I'm referring to both the current owners I never mentioned previous ones you did that yourself.
Since both the current owners have been in control they barely go a season or two without winning anything, who cares about whether a stadium is not owned by city I'm sure if they want it they could probably get it.
Both these clubs have success that we can only dream about, compared with stuttering amounts at moderate success of reaching top four or the occasional final.
I can just about handle Joe Lewis owning the club, because although he is dodgy at least he doesn't have blood on his hands.
But if Spurs were bought by slavers or murderers my support of the club would end that very day. There's no way I am being associated with that kind of shit under any circumstance, and there's definitely no way I will ever support it. And if some people are prepared to accept those kind of owners simply because they bring success to a club, then those people need to take a long hard look at themselves.
Last edited: