What's new

Let's All Laugh At... Let's all laugh at Chelsea thread

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,713
105,022
The sanctions on Anramovic don’t have an end date, only the special licence to operate until the 31st of May (which will allow Chelsea, current funds allowing, to complete the season) after which point the licence shall be reviewed by the Treasury. The sanctions on Abramovich themselves are a different matter to the licence

Yes, my mistake, I meant the licence runs until May.
 

RJR1949

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
957
5,391
We can all take some small pleasure in the fact that Chelsea’s operating licence does not allow them to pay any fees to agents, even for work already done.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,269
19,575
Any chance of them being sanctioned even more and deducted 20 points?

If the talk that they have enough cash to last a week or two is true, if they they can't pay staff/wages I would guess they would need to be placed into liquidation? Doesn't that carry a points penalty? Though I half think it will only apply from next year (as I am sure that's what would happen to derby, so using them as my bench mark)
 

King Yid

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2011
275
610
Yes, my mistake, I meant the licence runs until May.
I think you’re right though, I’d be surprised if this is resolved swiftly. I think the subtle difference with Chelsea is that it hasn’t been seized by the Gov, but frozen. Im not sure what that means in terms of how much involvement RA would have in the sale though.
 

Cream

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2019
642
1,898
Was actually reading from a piece of paper as he said it ;)
FF87D8_LEAD-e23f88d.jpg
 

Delboy75

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2021
3,935
10,279
Any chance of them being sanctioned even more and deducted 20 points?

Saw a financial expert who values clubs saying if it’s not sold quickly very good chance the receiver will come in meaning a points deduction. Also said first measure will be cutting players wages, sure they will love that.
 

topper

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2008
3,806
16,254
Chelsea’s bank accounts have been frozen, leaving the club facing financial ruin after the government sanctioned Roman Abramovich, The Times has been told.
The government yesterday gave Chelsea a licence to continue with football-related activities after Abramovich, the club’s owner, was sanctioned over his links to Vladimir Putin, the Russian president.
Sources at the club have warned that despite the licence several of the club’s corporate accounts, including credit cards, have been frozen because banks are being “risk-averse”.
“The licence allows the club to continue with day-to-day activities but the banks don’t have the risk appetite for it,” a source said. “They’ve frozen some of the corporate credit cards. It’s put a lot more pressure on the club.”
A senior source at Chelsea confirmed that the situation was causing grave concern. “It’s making it even more difficult to run our day-to-day operations,” the source explained.


Poor lambs?
 

Rogmeister

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
3,974
6,327
Personally I think that the govt will do just enough to give the impression they are coming down hard on RA and they really may do with some areas of his business but they will make just enough concessions to prevent CFC going bust
Exactly. They’ve already said this is about punishing RA and not the club, fans or the sport. I’m sure boris and his merry men will get it sold asap so they can wash their hands of it
 

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,712
25,299
Anyone who believes that Chelsea will suddenly become our and everyone else's whipping team, and that they will rapidly move down the table are living in cloud cuckoo land.
 

Westmorlandspur

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2013
2,936
4,795
Lots of people are getting caught in the crossfire of sanctions. A customer of mine works for BP, primarily in their Russian operation. He doesn't know if he'll have a job much longer. Thousands of people face the same situation, so why should footballers be different?

Edit; Chelsea have been shown a lot more leniency than other businesses and their employees.
Only reason they will sell the club is that Roman does not want any of the money so does not gain. Quite what Putin will make him selling it and all the money going to the British govt who will send it on to the Ukrainian war effort, I shudder to think. That is what could make it difficult to sell.
Roman will find that very difficult to agree to. Will make him look anti Putin.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,713
105,022
I think you’re right though, I’d be surprised if this is resolved swiftly. I think the subtle difference with Chelsea is that it hasn’t been seized by the Gov, but frozen. Im not sure what that means in terms of how much involvement RA would have in the sale though.

Bank accounts frozen now. I think there’s a lot of wishful thinking out there from people that they wont be fucked. Not us obviously, most want them in the complete shit.

 

GMI

G.
Dec 13, 2006
3,132
12,253
Anyone who believes that Chelsea will suddenly become our and everyone else's whipping team, and that they will rapidly move down the table are living in cloud cuckoo land.
I would tend to agree. There will be some short term pain but they will stabilise. However, financially, they will be back down with the rest of the pack, probably slightly worse due to their legacy of unsustainably. To be honest I’m happy with that.
What I really want to see is fundamental change in football and ownership in this country to stop these type of people from entering the game. If we are stuck with the City and Newcastle owners we need to strengthen ffp and how sponsorship is regulated to stop them doping. If they can’t throw their money around they may lose interest. ?
 
Top