mister_confused
Banned
- Sep 16, 2010
- 61
- 0
erm... NO>
its a general veiw for every spurs fan that ledley should start at cb for every game because he's the best we've got even though he can't play week in week out. Torres would be the same but even better because our striking options upfront are piss poor compared to him whereas in defence we have better options when ledley cant play.
All im saying is that anyone, knowing our strikeforce, who would turn down torres regardless of his injury problems is a nutcase.
so now you don't mind things that are easily crocked? opportunity costs, opportunity costs.
And worst of all, we don't need someone with Torres' ability to improve our strike force. It's so fucking pathetic that a player who isn't a total clodhopper would make for an upgrade on our current options.
something i do agree with. but for me (and probably a lot of other people) torres is the most "complete" striker in this generation on his day so i'd be happy for us to pay stupid amounts of money for him even if we only get to see those flashes of magic with him in our shirt only for a few months of the season.
I'd rather have Berbatov back.
id only have berbatov over torres if they were both the same age, otherwise it's torres every time.
Berbatov would be half the price and play twice as much and that would be enough for us to win the title.
;-)
torres for me...I think harry can reignite his career
Berbatov would be half the price and play twice as much and that would be enough for us to win the title.
how about a cheeky bid for mourinho as coach?? :lol: