He's a headless chicken, and will be shifted out at the first opportunity.
Imagine your incontinent uncle having a brief dry spell...
You are so wrong,on Saturday Zokora had a pass success rate of 95% and that is brilliant by anyones standards!
*ridiculously over-the-top post*
:lol:
... impressive if they all weren't to Hutton, sideways and backwards. Anything over 5 yards gets misplaced. I'm sorry but he's not a good enough central midfielder.
Put him at the back, however, and I'm an absolutely huge fan of him. It's so strange how him taking 3 steps back transforms him into a much better player.
To be fair though, from my perspective, I've always disliked him. I've never been fickle about it. :lol:
I prefer Zokora in a more defensive role too,Stoof,in fact I think he would be excellent in a 4-3-3 formation with Jenas and the Hudd ahead of him!
Careful Beni, I still "doo doo doo" along with the rest of them. I still cheer his name when he's announced. I still clap him off at the end of each half.
And yes mate, myself and young Daniel of talkshowhost fame made a point of noting the number of sideways passes to Hutton. That 95% figure crops up. :wink:
I know he keeps possession, but that's not the point of me countering the argument. People bleat that out as an amazing stat, one that should be lauded. But all I'm saying is that all those passes were to Hutton, or the odd one to Chimbonda. And the saddest thing is I'm not even exaggerating. If you really want to watch the game again and count them, I'll be more than happy to do it.
He's not a central midfielder mate, he really isn't. And his best performances for us have been at centre back. Can you argue with that?
I've backtracked enough times on this forum over him, but he's still not anywhere near Carrick's class, nor is he a Top 6 central midfielder. No way. No how
I disagree, it seems others on here, Ramos, Jol and other managers in Zokoras career do to.
Yet we finished 5th with him last season??
True, but it's not all that matters, I mean otherwise we wouldn't be here discussing it.
I dare say that was "in spite of" rather than "because of", Beni.
And ITK around the time (from more than one source) was that Jol didn't rate Zokora.
In Spite.......come on Stoof you're clutching now mate.
He played more times than not.
Whats that saying with those ITKs - BIG punch of salt needed.
Look, that's the most I'm not going to talk about it, and you still responded. I'm not clutching at straws. He wasn't even average in his first season. Words that you've just used. So how could he be the reason for us finishing there?
All I'm saying is that this is hardly a "cut and dry" he's a good player. He's probably the most discussed player, alongside Jenas on this forum. If it was that simple there wouldn't be such a horrific divide as there is. There is definitely scope for debate on his abilities as a central midfielder, and for me he's still not showing (18 months into his time here) glorious Viera-like performances. Or even Carrick-like. I know he's a different sort of midfielder to Carrick. He's also different in the sense that he's not a quality player. He's just not. He hasn't stamped his authority on our team and I think as with others we can do better - and I also think our central midfield is our priority transfer-wise.
oooopsZokora is pants. Typical mediocre African player. A great athlete but has the brains of a rocking horse.
Zokora is pants. Typical mediocre African player. A great athlete but has the brains of a rocking horse.
He's good at running isn't he? erm... i'm stuck.