- Jan 1, 2008
- 24,693
- 43,851
Absolutely the correct stance to takeSpurs are trying to offer money if they won’t accept the obligation they want his future in our hands
Absolutely the correct stance to takeSpurs are trying to offer money if they won’t accept the obligation they want his future in our hands
Smart - sounds like we’re doing the right thing despite the media making it sounds like a straight loan. Thanks WLB.Spurs are trying to offer money if they won’t accept the obligation they want his future in our hands
if it’s a loan with an option for fati or 50m for johnson it has to be fati
not only is it more financially viable, he also has a track record of end product at the highest level that brennan johnson does not
Absolutely love you and this but we’ve all been here so many times before mate and it almost always ends up in a ‘we tried’ and we are left well short.Can we stop debating one or the other, we want both! I'm not sure where the 'If you had to pick only one' debate has come from. If we do the deals we want to do, we will sign Fati on loan with an option, Johnson on a permanent and another CB. We have several to shift still but the club is still very positive. A very big 24 hours coming up where we need to line up as much of this as possible before heading into the last day.
Yeah... at least Fati with an option would mean we're planning for the long term and could be lining up Fati to replace Son.Lol why would you bring in Fati for a year to disrupt what will be a clear rebuild year? Makes no sense.
Just sign Johnson on a permanent and a CB. Call it good. We only play once a week.
Ansu Fati with a foot and a half in London
Very advanced negotiations for Tottenham to take over the player's services. A transfer option is being considered. Agreement very close to closing, a priori in an assignment format.
If nothing goes wrong, Ansu Fati will be a new Tottenham player.
Believe this guy is considered an ok source for Barca, certainly not a WUM atleast.
Can we stop debating one or the other, we want both! I'm not sure where the 'If you had to pick only one' debate has come from. If we do the deals we want to do, we will sign Fati on loan with an option, Johnson on a permanent and another CB. We have several to shift still but the club is still very positive. A very big 24 hours coming up where we need to line up as much of this as possible before heading into the last day.
Exactly my thinking.I did think it would almost certainly be a choice between Fati or Johnson.
Which is insane really. Completely different types of player and play on opposite sides too.
This stinks of someone sniffing an opportunity and throwing our plans out the window, all so we don't spend actual money?
Why on earth would we take Fati on a loan and not pursue someone our manager clearly wants as his number 1 target. We're basically getting someone in for 12 months instead of buying someone who the manager wants for his long term rebuild.
Regardless of my opinions on either player and what their worth, it's naffing insane.
Do you mean money as in a straight purchase?Spurs are trying to offer money if they won’t accept the obligation they want his future in our hands
Yes but he also intimated that we wanted van der Ven and Tapsoba so wouldn’t rest your hat on what he’s spouting.Reading Romano's tweet it sounds like it's a choice between Fati loan or Johnson permanent.
Yes but he also intimated that we wanted van der Ven and Tapsoba so wouldn’t rest your hat on what he’s spouting.
Have you watched him post injury? Because he's exactly that: a former wonderkid who isn't the same player anymore, no matter what people remember from before his injury or on Fifa, or by reputation alone.How is it not sensible to take a loan with an option? For a former wonderkid that averages a goal involvement every 110 minutes? It seems like a no-brainer.
Not my recollection but equally happily to stand correctedWasn't he the one who told us it would be one or the other, much to our disappointment?
He still was pretty damn good last season AFTER his injury in limited minutes so I still don't really understand what there is to lose.Because he's exactly that: a former wonderkid who isn't the same player anymore, no matter what people remember from before his injury or on Fifa, or by reputation alone.
As I said though, if we get him I'll back him like all our players.