Anyone heard why Modric and Bale didn't appear
- Thread starter DC_Boy
- Start date
- Status
Have you even bothered looking? Read the comments from HR regarding the result. He said that Bale, Modric and Dawson were all rested and that Defoe had a slight injury.
- Thread starter
- #5
thanks for the info pringle, despite your less than friendly tone - i made it quite clear i have looked
but anyway thanks again for info - puts my mind at rest
thanks for the info pringle, despite your less than friendly tone - i made it quite clear i have looked
but anyway thanks again for info - puts my mind at rest
You obviously failed to look in the opening article on the home page. Seems you looked well........ps why aint i on your ignore list still?
- Thread starter
- #7
you are on my ignore list - but when i make a thread, i have the courtesy to check all replies and despite your 'less than friendly' reply i really welcomed the news you brought re the team
i'v looked on the OS several times today and not seen the info you talk about - i clearly missed it, it happens - it's not a crime and there's no need to talk to me in that tone
but anyway, unless similar circumstances arise i won't be debating with you again
maybe you'll be a little more friendly in the future, but of course that's up to you
nice try pal but you posted this thread at 6.48pm - the article on the OS was on there 8 mins before that as I read it at 6.40. So maybe if you had looked before posting............. (dont come back with the "i did look but couldnt see it" as your above comment has nulified that).
Maybe this thread should be locked mods?
he dont himself i tell ya mate - the time he posted is up there and he tries to get out of it. i dont know whether to :rofl: or :bang:
Sometimes in life you just need to accept you fcuked up and move on.
lol
- Thread starter
- #16
hi antlesh - yes pringle and i have differed before
he's clearly misread my post and got it all wrong
i said i'd looked at the OS earlier and didn't see it
and that's no surprise cos it wasn't there
but the issue i had with him was not over his accuracy, but the unnecessary unfriendliness of his tone in his first post
which he's continued in subsequent posts
he's clearly misread my post and got it all wrong
i said i'd looked at the OS earlier and didn't see it
and that's no surprise cos it wasn't there
but the issue i had with him was not over his accuracy, but the unnecessary unfriendliness of his tone in his first post
which he's continued in subsequent posts
hi antlesh - yes pringle and i have differed before
he's clearly misread my post and got it all wrong
i said i'd looked at the OS earlier and didn't see it
and that's no surprise cos it wasn't there
but the issue i had with him was not over his accuracy, but the unnecessary unfriendliness of his tone in his first post
which he's continued in subsequent posts
:bang:
when you posted this thread it was there hence why i replied so soon with an answer. If you had bothered to look then this thread wouldnt be necessary.
antlesh - DC boy has a bit of a rep for putting people on ignore if you disagree with anything he says, but with threads like this he dont help himself. Just read the OS before posting BS threads in future u stupid plum!
CaptainCat
Well-Known Member
- Jan 12, 2005
- 7,874
- 56
He didnt make - started claiming how when he checked it wasnt online (surely it would make sense to check just before starting a new thread!!)
He has already had 1 thread locked today - i hope this is the second!
- Status
Similar threads
