- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,023
- 48,736
Yawn
I'd put Vermaelen in your first team ahead of Gallas but I'd agree with the rest.Gooner mate of mine arguing with me on Facebook there miles better than us and even frimpong and koschelny would walk into our team swell as arteta is better than modric! Sandro is shit and Song is better than any of our midfielders!
So got me thinking who on paper has the better side?
Here's my squad if I had to pick one!
-------------Scheszny-----------
SAGNA---Gallas---King---Ekotto
-----------------------------------
------VDV--Sandro--Modric------
------------------------------------
RVP---------Adebayor-------Bale
Bench
Friedel,Vermaelen,Lennon,Gervinho,Wilshire,Defoe,Parker
Friedel
Sagna
Vermalen
King
Ekotto
VDV
Wilshere
Modric
Bale
RVP
Adebayor
Van Persie is far superior to Adebayor, talent and atitude
No.
She-Ra is better.
... than Arshavin and Gervinho.
Couldn't care less, I don't use Arsenal as a benchmark to measure our success.
That midfield's a little bit soft isn't it ?
A little but Wilshere is pretty tenacious, likes a tackle...as does Modric to a lesser extent.
It's surprising how many rate Arshavin. He's very lazy and rarely involved in the match. And while capable of the odd moment of brilliance, it has only once (4 goals against Liverpool) really offset his overall contribution and tactical headaches. Against Blackburn for instance, Wilshere had 90 passes, Arteta a few less, Song and Gervinho had 60+ passes. Arshavin had 30.
Also Santos might be a very good signing. In his first Prem match, he was listed on the Opta stats as the most influential player for Arsenal. Early though