Easy enough to justify when you look at how much it would cost to replace him. The cost of his annual salary (£18.2m) wouldn't even buy you an average player nowadays let alone somebody who'd walk into the first team and replace a player like Ozil.Ozil on £350,000!!! Fucking hell, the world's gone mad.
Ozil signs a contract extension. I thought that might happen, mainly because he didn’t seem to have any other takers!
https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/fo...d-a3753851.html?amp&__twitter_impression=true
There must be something not legit with that, no?
Its true. Just for the laughs, its trueThere must be something not legit with that, no?
There must be something not legit with that, no?
Ozil on £350,000!!! Fucking hell, the world's gone mad.
Balls.
I'm glad he's staying. £350K a week for a 29 year old player who tends to go missing in the big games for the scum is good news for us.
Not as good as losing him for free and having to spend most of their transfer budget replacing him.
£350K a week would pay the wages of two world class players. I'd rather they wasted it on the underperforming Ozil.
Giroud to Chelsea confirmed, what an odd signing for both parties. Arsenal for selling another player to a rival and Chelsea for signing a player who's never been particularly stellar.
To put it in words he'd understand: très bizarre, non?
World class players? Not sure about that when Walcott was on £140k a week and AOC is on that at Liverpool now