Turn things around? He had us exactly where we should be in the table.
How did AVB take our squad backwards? He certainly can't be blamed for the Bale exit. Poch then inherited the exact same squad AVB left.
I really don't get why people aren't willing to accept that actually AVB got the very best out of this squad, a point which is painfully obvious right now in our current plight.
A squad which we have since learned contained summer signings which AVB didn't particularly want.
Poch inherited that very squad and his summer signings (and transfers out too) have been nothing short of appalling - although whether that's his fault of Baldini's we do not know yet. Evidence would suggest Fazio was a Poch signing and he is terrible.
We were already there before he had the job, in fact we'd finished 4th twice. We were pretty well established in the top five and he managed to maintain that, largely due to Bale papering over the cracks of his managerial style and tactics making us impotent in attack but slowly but surely the ability of our team/squad minus Bale was being eroded
He took us backwards in as far as his style of play made us almost completely reliant on Gareth Bale's ability to produce moments of magic from long range
Before AVB we were a side that created many opportunities and it was said for years that all we really needed to complete our team and be able to compete was to add a clinical striker who knew how to make the right runs to get on to those chances and fill his boots with goal after goal.
We later bought such a striker but thanks to AVB we and rearranged the whole structure of our team and its tactical style.
No longer we were a creative exciting unit prime for a fox in the box striker to make his clever runs and latch on to the abundance of chances we would present him, now we were a team set up to hold position in the middle of the park playing side ways and backwards passes strangling the game and oppositions potential to hurt us before eventually building up to a position where the likes of Bale would be in shooting range
This meant the fox in the box type striker was completely unsuited to our new style of play and outrageously isolated while long shots from the likes of Townsend and Sig replaced those of Bale (less effectively obviously)
In defence we had adopted a high line with diasterous consequences, we constantly let in late goals via simple passes over our high line for attackers to run into and dropped several key points that would later cost us heavily in the race for Europe. AVB repeating same errors he had made at Chelsea by being so rigid in his ideals of how the game should be played and failing to tailor them to the componets at his disposal (big brad in goal and the slow CB that neither marshalled this defensive line nor had any tangible cover or protection from the midfield ahead of it)
AVB was then credited with rectifying this - although in reality the reason it improved is Lloris replaced BRad and was far more capable of sweeping up and covering for the dysfunction of the back line (just as Bale covered for the impotence up front)
Now there are those who credit AVB with Bale's rise, personally I think that is rubbish and he was simply that good he would have developed regarldess - so the level of credit one gives to him re. Bale is subjective and a matter of opinion (yes I've seen the Bale quotes regarding this)
Equally I don't know how much credit to give AVB regarding Lloris, if he identfied him or suggested him as the keeper needed to make the high line work then fair play if not others deserve the credit (either way I place a certain amount of blame on AVB playing Brad for too long while Lloris was ready to start and/or playing the high line with Brad before introducing Lloris as it clearly cost us valuable points)
So yes AVB maintained our position, but to me we were a disporportionatly strong squad compared to our rivals below the top five and we were already consistently performing at that level for a number of years (just as he is producing what he should produce with a Zenit side disproportionately stronger than its rivals in Russia or how Lennon had such relative success with Celtic over a sustained period of time)
But he laid in place this style of play which leaves our strikers isolated and blunts our attack while holding meaningless possession in the centre areas and being potentially vunerable at the back due to the line of the defence and lack of cohesive leadership making indivdual errors so costly
To this day we're trying to recover from how dependant he made us on Bale in my opinion, Sherwood showed how the attack could be changed to be more creative and free scoring but largely at the expense of defensive stabilty and now under Poch he is trying to clear up the mess he inherited that stemmed from AVB's time in charge
Lots of the damage AVB caused went under the radar because for the most part results remained relatievly constant, but they were slowly but surely starting to present themselves and I firmly believe had AVB stayed in charge they would have only got worse and worse and he would have reached an untenable stage where even his supporters (who hold on to the benefit of doubt created by him departing before the full extent of his damage came to present itself on the pitch as it is still doing now in my eyes) would have agreed he must go
That said I aim even more blame at Levy, one because I think AVB was a foolish appointment in the first place and two because he I am certain made numerous mistakes in the transfer market which compounded the issue and made AVB's job harder.
You don't have to agree with me, clearly you don't, that's my opinion and I will happily leave you to yours because frankly this debate was done to death when AVB left in the first place and I highly doubt that either you or I will present any new information to one another which wasn't really discussed in full at the time and I am certain neither will change the others mind because the crux of the matter comes down to a difference of opinion as to what would have happened had he stayed which neither of us can ever truly know or prove
He took us backwards in as far as his style of play made us almost completely reliant on Gareth Bale's ability to produce moments of magic from long range
Before AVB we were a side that created many opportunities and it was said for years that all we really needed to complete our team and be able to compete was to add a clinical striker who knew how to make the right runs to get on to those chances and fill his boots with goal after goal.
We later bought such a striker but thanks to AVB we and rearranged the whole structure of our team and its tactical style.
No longer we were a creative exciting unit prime for a fox in the box striker to make his clever runs and latch on to the abundance of chances we would present him, now we were a team set up to hold position in the middle of the park playing side ways and backwards passes strangling the game and oppositions potential to hurt us before eventually building up to a position where the likes of Bale would be in shooting range
This meant the fox in the box type striker was completely unsuited to our new style of play and outrageously isolated while long shots from the likes of Townsend and Sig replaced those of Bale (less effectively obviously)
In defence we had adopted a high line with diasterous consequences, we constantly let in late goals via simple passes over our high line for attackers to run into and dropped several key points that would later cost us heavily in the race for Europe. AVB repeating same errors he had made at Chelsea by being so rigid in his ideals of how the game should be played and failing to tailor them to the componets at his disposal (big brad in goal and the slow CB that neither marshalled this defensive line nor had any tangible cover or protection from the midfield ahead of it)
AVB was then credited with rectifying this - although in reality the reason it improved is Lloris replaced BRad and was far more capable of sweeping up and covering for the dysfunction of the back line (just as Bale covered for the impotence up front)
Now there are those who credit AVB with Bale's rise, personally I think that is rubbish and he was simply that good he would have developed regarldess - so the level of credit one gives to him re. Bale is subjective and a matter of opinion (yes I've seen the Bale quotes regarding this)
Equally I don't know how much credit to give AVB regarding Lloris, if he identfied him or suggested him as the keeper needed to make the high line work then fair play if not others deserve the credit (either way I place a certain amount of blame on AVB playing Brad for too long while Lloris was ready to start and/or playing the high line with Brad before introducing Lloris as it clearly cost us valuable points)
So yes AVB maintained our position, but to me we were a disporportionatly strong squad compared to our rivals below the top five and we were already consistently performing at that level for a number of years (just as he is producing what he should produce with a Zenit side disproportionately stronger than its rivals in Russia or how Lennon had such relative success with Celtic over a sustained period of time)
But he laid in place this style of play which leaves our strikers isolated and blunts our attack while holding meaningless possession in the centre areas and being potentially vunerable at the back due to the line of the defence and lack of cohesive leadership making indivdual errors so costly
To this day we're trying to recover from how dependant he made us on Bale in my opinion, Sherwood showed how the attack could be changed to be more creative and free scoring but largely at the expense of defensive stabilty and now under Poch he is trying to clear up the mess he inherited that stemmed from AVB's time in charge
Lots of the damage AVB caused went under the radar because for the most part results remained relatievly constant, but they were slowly but surely starting to present themselves and I firmly believe had AVB stayed in charge they would have only got worse and worse and he would have reached an untenable stage where even his supporters (who hold on to the benefit of doubt created by him departing before the full extent of his damage came to present itself on the pitch as it is still doing now in my eyes) would have agreed he must go
That said I aim even more blame at Levy, one because I think AVB was a foolish appointment in the first place and two because he I am certain made numerous mistakes in the transfer market which compounded the issue and made AVB's job harder.
You don't have to agree with me, clearly you don't, that's my opinion and I will happily leave you to yours because frankly this debate was done to death when AVB left in the first place and I highly doubt that either you or I will present any new information to one another which wasn't really discussed in full at the time and I am certain neither will change the others mind because the crux of the matter comes down to a difference of opinion as to what would have happened had he stayed which neither of us can ever truly know or prove