What's new

Barcelona's Neymar Nightmare

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
This does just show once again in my opinion that clubs and clubs only should hold the registration and economic rights for a player. No 3rd parties/agents etc as owners of a player should be allowed.
Brazil would go batshit crazy and they claim their league would go bankrupt without 3rd part crooks
 

RichieS

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2004
11,916
16,436
Ok, but wouldn't it basically be the same thing if he let his contract expire, or are the rules different over there?
What used to happen here before the Bosman ruling? I can't remember.
 

hugrr

Gimme some gravey
Aug 17, 2008
11,465
15,136
What used to happen here before the Bosman ruling? I can't remember.

Before it was put in place, a player could only transfer from one club to another if both his old club and new club agreed on a deal, which is actually still the way it works today but the difference being that it also applied to players who weren’t under contract at their old club so as a consequence, transfer fees still had to be paid for out of contract players

So if you played for a club, they would still demand a transfer fee for you even if your contract had expired.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
So if you played for a club, they would still demand a transfer fee for you even if your contract had expired.
It would go to a tribunal but the spanish press claim that Neymar had the option to leave the contract(apparently the contract was very complicated) and also worth noting that Barca had paid €10mill a couple of years to have first option on them and if he was sold to someone else Santos would have to pay Barca a fine which would be more than the 10mill
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
Is @TheAmerican getting paid for viewers from SC?

Literally nothing is happening lol, I went for shit came back, to see its the same shit!:mad:
 

TheAmerican

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2012
6,913
18,761
dxu9Xpa.gif
 
Top