As has been repeated ad nauseum by many; Capel is good, has a reasonable buy-out clause but there is no way Sevilla will deal with us. Technically they are obliged to but in practice they can make it impossible.
As has been repeated ad nauseum by many; Capel is good, has a reasonable buy-out clause but there is no way Sevilla will deal with us. Technically they are obliged to but in practice they can make it impossible.
How can Sevilla do this?
If we match the release clause of one of their players, then as a matter of European law we have permission to speak to the player and his representatives. If we can agree personal terms with the player, and he then passes a medical, he is our player.
Sevilla cannot interfere with this legal process.
That's what I was thinking. As long as we matched the release clause, what can Sevilla do to stop us?
Would be very supprised.
"I have a contract for three years. I want to stay at Rangers for life," he said.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12040_3424327,00.html
Dragging their heels, not responding to faxes/emails, not being available for conf calls/meetings, "misunderstandings" in correspondence.... while in the meantime hawking him around to every other club in the market and probably badmouthing Spurs to the player/agent.
Yes, legally they must, practically it's a different matter. If they so desire they can waste plenty of DL and DC's time with the above tactics - to the point that it's not worth the effort. They'll probably signal their planned approach to us as well and save everyone the time.
Dragging their heels, not responding to faxes/emails, not being available for conf calls/meetings, "misunderstandings" in correspondence.... while in the meantime hawking him around to every other club in the market and probably badmouthing Spurs to the player/agent.
Yes, legally they must, practically it's a different matter. If they so desire they can waste plenty of DL and DC's time with the above tactics - to the point that it's not worth the effort. They'll probably signal their planned approach to us as well and save everyone the time.
With respect, nickspurs, once we've triggered the release clause, we deal directly with the player and his representatives. Sevilla Chairman Del Nido would be left fuming all the way to the bank...
Release fees are as legally binding as Bosmans. Did we want Judas to go to the Scum? No. Could we stop that deal? No.
A few years ago, Real Madrid triggered Figo's release clause at Barca. Barca were furious, but couldn't stop the transfer. All that happened was that Figo got a pig's head chucked at him when he played at Barca in a white Real Madrid shirt, and was called a pesetero (roughly "money whore").
If we trigger the release clause of Capel the only questions are:
- does he want to come to us?
- will we pay him enough?
- will he pass a medical?
Del Nido can swivel.
Dragging their heels, not responding to faxes/emails, not being available for conf calls/meetings, "misunderstandings" in correspondence.... while in the meantime hawking him around to every other club in the market and probably badmouthing Spurs to the player/agent.
Yes, legally they must, practically it's a different matter. If they so desire they can waste plenty of DL and DC's time with the above tactics - to the point that it's not worth the effort. They'll probably signal their planned approach to us as well and save everyone the time.