- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
The context:
We are being linked with McCarthy again. Some of us think that this type of signing is exactly the type we should be avoiding. It's not that he's a bad footballer, he's not, he's decent, but we believe that he either doesn't represent enough of an improvement on what we have or what we are close to developing to warrant the fee and wages that will be involved and these resources could be better spent.
Various posts were exchanged by these were the last two:
This was a @THFCSPURS19 response to @IGSpur
To which I responded:
I'm really fed up with reading this "coaches think he the player's not ready" bullshit. Mostly who's not ready are the coaches. They are not ready to put their bollocks on the line and trust their ability to coach footballers to be better, individually and collectively, physically and mentally, they are not ready to trust their ability to achieve tactical excellence, so they fall back on "buying experience".
And I didn't just say development group, I said already here too. Forget comparing videos, I watched Mason utterly dominate McCarthy in his own back yard. He saw nearly three times as much ball as him (Mason 90 passes/ Mc 34 passes), still gave it away less (Mason 88.9%/ Mc 82.4%). he made more tackles, more interceptions (Mas 2/3 - Mc 1/1), he made three key passes to McCarthy's none.
So McCarthy, with his "6" years of experience was thoroughly outplayed by a kid having his first season, not just of EPL football, but of any real football.
Mason is industrious, tenacious, and can play in both halves of the pitch, and both him and Bentaleb have more character, are more vocal and have more pitch leadership.
We do not need to spend 15-20m on a player when, with better coaching, we have at least one here who could be much better, and IMO already is at least as good.
.
We are being linked with McCarthy again. Some of us think that this type of signing is exactly the type we should be avoiding. It's not that he's a bad footballer, he's not, he's decent, but we believe that he either doesn't represent enough of an improvement on what we have or what we are close to developing to warrant the fee and wages that will be involved and these resources could be better spent.
Various posts were exchanged by these were the last two:
This was a @THFCSPURS19 response to @IGSpur
You say Veljkovic is 100% ready but I'm sure Pochettino and the coaches, the academy staff and our analysts know far more about whether this is the case or not. I think he's good enough as a back-up DM, but certainly not as a starting DM.
The bit about comparing videos of players is a bit ridiculous IMO. Means nothing.
To which I responded:
I'm really fed up with reading this "coaches think he the player's not ready" bullshit. Mostly who's not ready are the coaches. They are not ready to put their bollocks on the line and trust their ability to coach footballers to be better, individually and collectively, physically and mentally, they are not ready to trust their ability to achieve tactical excellence, so they fall back on "buying experience".
And I didn't just say development group, I said already here too. Forget comparing videos, I watched Mason utterly dominate McCarthy in his own back yard. He saw nearly three times as much ball as him (Mason 90 passes/ Mc 34 passes), still gave it away less (Mason 88.9%/ Mc 82.4%). he made more tackles, more interceptions (Mas 2/3 - Mc 1/1), he made three key passes to McCarthy's none.
So McCarthy, with his "6" years of experience was thoroughly outplayed by a kid having his first season, not just of EPL football, but of any real football.
Mason is industrious, tenacious, and can play in both halves of the pitch, and both him and Bentaleb have more character, are more vocal and have more pitch leadership.
We do not need to spend 15-20m on a player when, with better coaching, we have at least one here who could be much better, and IMO already is at least as good.
.
Last edited: