- Jul 21, 2003
- 8,642
- 9,313
He's trying to gag you because IT'S THE WRONG BLOODY THREAD FOR TALKING ABOUT LEVY.
Is it clear now?
Its ALWAYS the right thread for Mullers
He's trying to gag you because IT'S THE WRONG BLOODY THREAD FOR TALKING ABOUT LEVY.
Is it clear now?
Right @Lilbaz and @THFCSPURS19, I will no longer talk about Levy in this thread but I expect you to be the same to anyone talking about Levy.
Sorry, just to be clear, are you saying that if his position in the club changes, you don't mind me talking about Levy?Fair enough. Although if things develop and more info comes out about Levy's position at the club, then I think it's fine to talk about it. Until then, let's continue salivating over this potential takeover.
I can't talk about it Steve even though I could reply to what you say, lets respect the posters wishes.We all know your views Mullers and I truly believe most respect them, even if they dont agree. Just maybe repeating the same things every time is counter productive?
Sorry, just to be clear, are you saying that if his position in the club changes, you don't mind me talking about Levy?
Any more info on the Israeli's that the Evening Standard mentioned? Not sure how that would go down with sponsors (we've seen on this site how volatile discussing Israel is).
Nope I didn't start it, I haven't started one topic about Levy.Think he's saying if they do make a bid and want to keep Levy or get rid. Then discuss the pro's and cons. Otherwise there is 90 pages of discussion in the Is Levy Holding Us Back thread (that you started?).
Thats because we weren't good enough, it doesn't mean that the aspiration or mentality wasn't there. It was there even from Sugars day.[/quote
You know we can`t "name" potential chairman. Its not like choosing a new coach or manager based on previous performance. In my opinion, theres a 90% a new chairman would perform better than Levy, and a 10% chance he`d be worse. For me, thats a chance worth taking. And by "better", I mean delivering success and trophies on the pitch. Which is surely, as football fans, the benchmark we should be using. Not the fact he`s able to get 83million off Real Madrid or has a reputation for not backing, then sacking, every manager he appoints."Merely" no but embellished to the enth degree by the media, yes. Then the Levy naysayers lap it like its gospel.
Name a better chairman to replace Levy if this takeover comes off AND they want him to go?
You know we can`t "name" potential chairman. Its not like choosing a new coach or manager based on previous performance. In my opinion, theres a 90% a new chairman would perform better than Levy, and a 10% chance he`d be worse. For me, thats a chance worth taking. And by "better", I mean delivering success and trophies on the pitch. Which is surely, as football fans, the benchmark we should be using. Not the fact he`s able to get 83million off Real Madrid or has a reputation for not backing, then sacking, every manager he appoints.
If this takeover happens would think nfl would come white hart lane eventually
Nope. I think they would've had to do what Cain Hoy did if they were interested.Any more info on the Israeli's that the Evening Standard mentioned? Not sure how that would go down with sponsors (we've seen on this site how volatile discussing Israel is).
How on earth is it possible to come to that conclusion? What you're saying is that 90% of the football club chairmen in the world are doing a better job than Levy. And that's just simply not true.You know we can`t "name" potential chairman. Its not like choosing a new coach or manager based on previous performance. In my opinion, theres a 90% a new chairman would perform better than Levy, and a 10% chance he`d be worse. For me, thats a chance worth taking. And by "better", I mean delivering success and trophies on the pitch. Which is surely, as football fans, the benchmark we should be using. Not the fact he`s able to get 83million off Real Madrid or has a reputation for not backing, then sacking, every manager he appoints.
You know we can`t "name" potential chairman. Its not like choosing a new coach or manager based on previous performance. In my opinion, theres a 90% a new chairman would perform better than Levy, and a 10% chance he`d be worse. For me, thats a chance worth taking. And by "better", I mean delivering success and trophies on the pitch. Which is surely, as football fans, the benchmark we should be using. Not the fact he`s able to get 83million off Real Madrid or has a reputation for not backing, then sacking, every manager he appoints.
So, you agree with me do you. i.e, suggesting we as fans can name our choice of chairman is silly, and the benchmark of success should be success on the pitch and trophies won. If you dont agree, then instead of childish sarcasm why not detail your argument against my points.Thanks for that, Knob! Duly noted!