- Jul 9, 2007
- 12,780
- 13,817
I mean, yeah its all hypothetical stuff, and you can make reasoned arguments. Definetly the perception of how far we had fallen post-redknapp was massively overstated. In my view we were a europa-qualifying team that transformed into a CL qualifying team with a few title tilts included.Maybe I wasn’t being clear. This is mainly aimed at the non Spurs supporters that feel that Poch took a bunch of misfits and turned them into a great team on a shoestring budget and we’d be nothing without him. Would Dele and Kane have hit the heights they did without him? It’s impossible to tell but if we were always near the top of the league when he arrived then he wouldn’t have been afforded the opportunity to try out the youth. Like I said, I think it was the perfect partnership at the right time but I refuse to believe that we would have been lingering in mid table at the same time without him.
My issue is that there is a section of Spurs fans who seem keen to violently break from the past, and in doing so they create counternarratives to underplay that during these years we came out of them in a position much stronger than we left, and how Poch was part of that. There is also this sort of cultish mentality that anything which isn't Mourinho is the best or something like that is some sort of anti-spurs opinion. It's a very hostile environment these days, and I frankly don't understand why it needs to be. Even hating Mourinho doesn't make you anti-spurs (I am broadly supportive of Jose, though I do not believe him to be perfect, nor was Poch and his stubborness), and wishing people well doesn't have anything to do with ones support of Spurs.
I dunno, it's like some ultra-defensive attitude that you get after a bad breakup, rather than appreciating things or even accepting the good with the bad, it's like no, lets destroy things. You had that to some extent post Redknapp and post Jol too. But it feels much stronger a reaction now. I suspect in part it might be due to the nature of the world now, where everything is hyper emotional and a more hostile world and in part it might be due to how Mourinho himself creates this us vs them mentality that can be very useful in a footballing context as well as controlling the narrative of the perception people have on him. Like if Mourinho was a politician he'd be a hyper-populist figure, it's sport though, so it's all part of the drama, and a bit of fun. I have seen plenty of occasions that deeply trouble me when people have received personal abuse on the basis of fringe opinions, which is not acceptable. Even questioning someones support for the club is worrying but, ok, fine. But I've seen it go much further than that and it sickens me.