- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,041
- 29,639
Yes it was.
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/features/home-grown-quota-for-premier-league.html
Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore believes the England team will ultimately reap the rewards of the ruling which he feels will discourage Clubs from hoarding young, overseas players.
"It's not in the Club's interests to stockpile players," said Scudamore. "It will make buying Home Grown talent more attractive.
"We're not going down the route of a nationality test but what this means is that you can't just buy a team from abroad.
"We think it gives Clubs an exta incentive to invest in youth and we also think one of the benefits of that will be that it will help the England team."
No the original rule was to promote academies. However Scudamore was getting flack for not caring about the english national team, which he doesnt but the rule wasn't done to promote the england national team.The UEFA rule does not affect teams in the PL, it only affects the squads teams submit for UEFA competitions. The PL adopted a similar format for their HG rules but as shown by Scudmore's comments, the National team was very much in the thinking.
He says even in the bit you highlighted that it makes club invest in their youth programs and that would benefit the national team but he did say it was done for the national team.
The reason Scudamore did the rule was to limit the amount of foreigners coming in, clubs wouldnt agree to a cap so they just enforced part of the uefa rule. The uefa rule is 8 homegrown players as well as 3/4 club trained players.
The clubs wouldnt agree to a quota so they just used this instead, i.e. the UEFA imposed Quota.
Also Eric Dier isn't a future England player, he is atm either a future england player or a future Portugal player. If he picks Portugal how does that benefit the national team.
He also clearly says its not about the nationality test(which is what Dier is) but to stop teams hoarding foreign players