What's new

Eriksen turns down latest Contract offer.

rabbikeane

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2005
6,988
12,833
30 is his current deal, for a young player on less in dutch football.
We've probably offered him 60 or so, while he know he can get 100 elsewhere and that Kane will get as much with guys like Lamela and Lloris not far behind.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
We need to sign more competition for his role, for me he doesn't perform at a high enough level consistently and doesn't take enough risks with the ball to create.

I don't think he'd be the most loyal player if some big clubs fluttered their eyelashes his way (although who really is these days?). Honestly think too many use stats to justify his performances, when he could do a lot more. Too often games seem to pass him by a bit for me.

I personally wouldn't be gutted if we sold and replaced tbh.

With who though?
 

Sandros Shiny Head

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
4,794
8,765
30 is his current deal, for a young player on less in dutch football.
We've probably offered him 60 or so, while he know he can get 100 elsewhere and that Kane will get as much with guys like Lamela and Lloris not far behind.
True but Kane definitely deserves higher than he does
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
By the time the transfer window is closed, the amount of players off the books wages wise, and most probably show a profit on fees, the contract renewal figures rumours going about what Kane and Dier are due, then the likes of Eriksen and Lamela and possibly Lloris will need to be reviewed seriously.

If Eriksen is on 30k, then I believe he is on less than Bentaleb. Though to be totally honest I could of sworn I view a site months back on another topic and his wages were a lot more


If Eriksen is currently on 30k a week, i will eat my and everyone elses hat.

I don't doubt that players including Eriksen deserve merit pay increases but i read on here (or somewhere) that "We (the club) shouldn't make him unhappy!

I'd be seriously pissed i guess if i had to survive on a meager 30k a week, in fact i'd be distraught.....
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Dude the wife beating hasn't been proven and could well be slander so kinda harsh to tag him with that...

I have the First and Fifth Amendment at my disposal old bean.

Chill, i got this............;)
 

glospur

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2015
2,608
9,806
We need to sign more competition for his role, for me he doesn't perform at a high enough level consistently and doesn't take enough risks with the ball to create.

I don't think he'd be the most loyal player if some big clubs fluttered their eyelashes his way (although who really is these days?). Honestly think too many use stats to justify his performances, when he could do a lot more. Too often games seem to pass him by a bit for me.

I personally wouldn't be gutted if we sold and replaced tbh.
Again, this is categorically, demonstrably wrong. Only Ozil was more creative than Eriksen across the course of last season. Using stats is pretty much the only way to judge creativity, because in the end it's all about tangible production, not just what you can see with your own eyes.

There is also no one that we could afford or that would come who is better than Eriksen.
 

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,279
21,788
We need to sign more competition for his role, for me he doesn't perform at a high enough level consistently and doesn't take enough risks with the ball to create.

I don't think he'd be the most loyal player if some big clubs fluttered their eyelashes his way (although who really is these days?). Honestly think too many use stats to justify his performances, when he could do a lot more. Too often games seem to pass him by a bit for me.

I personally wouldn't be gutted if we sold and replaced tbh.

Pritchard...:cry:
 

SpursFan2013

Member
Aug 20, 2013
29
29
4 pages on this because of click bait, terrible. Don't believe for a moment that eriksen is on 30k a week with us.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
27,014
61,942
4 pages on this because of click bait, terrible. Don't believe for a moment that eriksen is on 30k a week with us.

I would say with almost 100% certainty that he is on 30k a week with us. Certainly won't be for long though so the whole thing is entirely irrelevant.
 

npearl4spurs

Believing Member
Sep 9, 2014
4,261
11,142
59 goals in two seasons says yeah

So just because it is easier to quantify Kane's impact that makes him worth more? Not buying that.

I think Eriksen and Lloris certainly, and arguably Alderweireld, Lamela, and Dier, should be paid whatever Kane is getting paid. Especially if Alderweireld Lamela and Dier match last season's form or increase their respective play as Kane did.

Going a bit off topic however
 
Top