- Dec 22, 2003
- 8,066
- 7,536
I know this is a little late, interesting none-the-less. I contacted the FA over the dismissal of the red card appeal and I found an email in my inbox this morning to explain it.
Thank you for contacting The Football Association.
Under guidance from FIFA, The FA’s Regulatory Commission can only overturn a dismissal if the Commission is satisfied that the referee made a serious and obvious error.
In accordance with FIFA directives, The FA cannot ‘re-referee’ matches (this includes the upgrading and downgrading of red and yellow cards). In the interests of fairness, we do allow claims for wrongful dismissal in the case of serious and obvious error only – as an exception to FIFA’s general approach. This facility is not supposed to give players a second bite at the cherry but to allow claims to succeed only in very limited circumstances. The onus is on the appealing Club to prove that a serious and obvious error has been made. This will often be difficult where the case concerns a tackle which clearly merited a caution.
In relation to Robbie Keane’s appeal, after taking all evidence into account the Regulatory Commission rejected the appeal.
While I appreciate you may not agree with the decision in Mr Keane’s case, I can assure you that it was dealt with in line with all claims for wrongful dismissal and I would once again like to thank you for taking the time to contact us.
Thank you for contacting The Football Association.
Under guidance from FIFA, The FA’s Regulatory Commission can only overturn a dismissal if the Commission is satisfied that the referee made a serious and obvious error.
In accordance with FIFA directives, The FA cannot ‘re-referee’ matches (this includes the upgrading and downgrading of red and yellow cards). In the interests of fairness, we do allow claims for wrongful dismissal in the case of serious and obvious error only – as an exception to FIFA’s general approach. This facility is not supposed to give players a second bite at the cherry but to allow claims to succeed only in very limited circumstances. The onus is on the appealing Club to prove that a serious and obvious error has been made. This will often be difficult where the case concerns a tackle which clearly merited a caution.
In relation to Robbie Keane’s appeal, after taking all evidence into account the Regulatory Commission rejected the appeal.
While I appreciate you may not agree with the decision in Mr Keane’s case, I can assure you that it was dealt with in line with all claims for wrongful dismissal and I would once again like to thank you for taking the time to contact us.