Fernando Llorente

[Trw3011]

Would Chelsea do a deal on Tammy Abraham ? Kid looks like he has something about him

 

[tiger666]

Would Chelsea do a deal on Tammy Abraham ? Kid looks like he has something about him

I very much doubt they would let anyone go permanently.

 

[dagraham]

Still think we should sell Llorente in exchange for batshuyai.

Although, if Llorente had to leave, I’d be happy to Giroud, I think he’s massively under rated and under appreciated at arsenal and much better than Llorente.

Sounds easy doesn’t it? Batshuyai isn’t a piece of meat. Why would he swap Chelsea’s bench for ours and probably a reduction in wages?

And Giroud to us? I don’t need to explain to you why that’s not going to happen, even though I agree with you that’s he’s underrated.

 

[Japhet]

We shouldn't sell Llorente to Chelsea unless we are getting Batshuayi in return

Batshuayi won't come here to sit on the bench 98% of the time.

 

[dagraham]

Still don’t see why people are happy for Llorente to leave with no replacement?

We all agree he has been crap, but one injury to Son and we will have one striker in the squad with 3 competitions to fight for.

And that’s before you even take into account that Son isn’t even a true CF and is better played elsewhere.

 

[Ben1]

I very much doubt they would let anyone go permanently.

I very much doubt we care about what suits Chelsea. If they want our player, compromise will have to play a part somewhere

 

[Japhet]

Would Chelsea do a deal on Tammy Abraham ? Kid looks like he has something about him

He's at Swansea for the season.

 

[tiger666]

I very much doubt we care about what suits Chelsea. If they want our player, compromise will have to play a part somewhere

Doesn't work like that does it. Chelsea will go elsewhere, we'll still have Llorente.

 

[sandros kung fu kick]

Im at work and struggling to keep up with the news re llorente.

Would one of you fine folk be able to give a brief overview of whats going on?

 

[Univarn]

Im at work and struggling to keep up with the news re llorente.

Would one of you fine folk be able to give a brief overview of whats going on?

He may be leaving. We may replace if he does. Most of the rest is conjecture and wishful thinking.

 

[talkshowhost86]

Looks to me as if the Goat's ITK from last night now needs to be amended to read:

"Llllorente possiblly lleaving if alll transfers from other cllubs fallll into pllace quicklly before the transfer window clloses."

 

[dagraham]

Im at work and struggling to keep up with the news re llorente.

Would one of you fine folk be able to give a brief overview of whats going on?

ITK late last night he might leave. Chelsea possible destination, although just speculation and seems to be linked to the PEA to Arse transfer.

Rumour we asked for Batshuyi in exchange for Llorente, but understandably Bat not keen.

Most people using the logical part of their brain think this means a replacement if Llorente leaves, but conveniently forgetting this is Spurs we’re talking about.

 

[teok]

Im at work and struggling to keep up with the news re llorente.

Would one of you fine folk be able to give a brief overview of whats going on?

There have been suggestions that Llorente could be leaving with chelsea the rumoured destination. Nobody seems to really understand why we would sell to them though. I'm personally not getting it either but that makes the situation even more intriguing.

So in short you know as much as (most of) us.

 

[Basil Brush]

Still don’t see why people are happy for Llorente to leave with no replacement?

We all agree he has been crap, but one injury to Son and we will have one striker in the squad with 3 competitions to fight for.

And that’s before you even take into account that Son isn’t even a true CF and is better played elsewhere.

I think nobody wants to sell Llorente without a replacement.

That is 1 thing all spurs fans agree on.

 

[MarkyP]

PSG must have a spare striker knocking about we can take.. 2 for 1 kinda deal...

 

[Univarn]

Looks to me as if the Goat's ITK from last night now needs to be amended to read:

"Llllorente possiblly lleaving if alll transfers from other cllubs fallll into pllace quicklly before the transfer window clloses."

Careful with those Ls. With that many this site will be on a proper witch hunt to sell even the custodial staff with Ls in their name.

 

[dagraham]

I think nobody wants to sell Llorente without a replacement.

That is 1 thing all spurs fans agree on.

If you read the thread that’s not quite true.

 

[Styopa]

In my opinion we'd be crazy to let him go to Chelsea while there remains the possibility of us catching them. He's been ineffectual for us but we know from his time at Swansea that he is capable of scoring goals in this league. We'd be potentially strengthening a direct rival which makes no sense to me whatsoever. Why help them out?

 

[HildoSpur]

Still don’t see why people are happy for Llorente to leave with no replacement?

We all agree he has been crap, but one injury to Son and we will have one striker in the squad with 3 competitions to fight for.

And that’s before you even take into account that Son isn’t even a true CF and is better played elsewhere.

I wouldn't say happy but I can see the logic of using Son up front with Moura on the wing. I'd be happier if we brought in a young, promising striker but there is only a day left in this window so it looks unlikely.

 

[bigfrooj]

I think we're better off without Llorente, replacement or not lined up. He's a spent player blocking the bench for someone that can actually run. If we get our money back then snap their fingers off for it, even if it is chelsea.