What's new

Gareth Bale

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
I brought him up initially because I said he was the only player I could think of who'd made a step down to a former club for less money than he could have gotten elsewhere, which is what Bale would be doing for us, and even then Rooney was firmly in his twilight years. If anyone can point me to another example I'm all ears.
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
I brought him up initially because I said he was the only player I could think of who'd made a step down to a former club for less money than he could have gotten elsewhere, which is what Bale would be doing for us, and even then Rooney was firmly in his twilight years. If anyone can point me to another example I'm all ears.

Yeah but we need to find somewhere else to play first buddy.
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
Also the commercial value of Bale cannot be underestimated. And even if we get two seasons out of him he still would fetch a huge price tag from the MLS or the Chinese Super League.
China's not spending like they did a few years ago anymore and MLS would never stump up a transfer fee higher than $15mil. The record transfer in is $12mil.
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
Yeah but we need to find somewhere else to play first buddy.

The problem isn't mentioning Rooney, it's discussing his playing record.

If Bale comes back it'll be the first instance of an in-demand player that has willingly decided to take less money to join a former club. The fact that nobody can point me to another one is definitely relevant.
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
That's like saying Rooney wouldn't flop at Everton, he was proven in the PL, CL, International, blah blah.

"But Rooney was on the decline." So is Bale. Or at least there's no guarrantee he's not and a lot of evidence to suggest he is.

"Bale wouldn't flop." Yeh, nor would Kaka at Real. Or Torres at Chelsea. Or Falcao at United. Or Pato. Or Schevchenko. Or Sergei Rebrov. Anyone can flop anywhere, regardless of whether you've played there before or what experience you've got. And its particularly ominious if you've been flopping for the past 2 years already.

"If you mean his injuries and that he could break down, that's a possibility for all players." Perhaps, but who is it more a possibility for, a guy who's perma-crocked or never been injured? There's a reason we're offloading Dembele and Wilshere's not going to the World Cup, and it's not because they're no good, it's because they're injury prone as fuck.

Look I'd love the Bale of 6 years ago back as much as the next guy, the only difference is that I've got my head out of the clouds and am seeing this potential transfer for what it is; a big risk with a lot of our money on a potentially-class-but-injury-prone guy that's been on the decline for the past 2 years.

Rooney was become less and less effective for Man U in his last few seasons, and is in the headlines for the wrong reasons more than good.

we know we wouldn't be getting the Bale of 6years ago, but if we get the Bale that performs as good as he does for Wales we would be getting a player that will add points. I love Eriksen, but with Bale standing over a free kick, I'd expect him to work the keeper more at least, if not score 3+ free kicks, and even if his pace isn't the same, he has enough turn of pace and trickery that will win those free kicks.

there is no guarantee that any player might struggle "FLOP", every single transfer we can afford could go that way. I watch a lot of football every weekend, and to be honest with you, I don't think Martial is anything special. yes on his day he is special, but those days are not consistent
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
Rooney was become less and less effective for Man U in his last few seasons, and is in the headlines for the wrong reasons more than good.

we know we wouldn't be getting the Bale of 6years ago, but if we get the Bale that performs as good as he does for Wales we would be getting a player that will add points. I love Eriksen, but with Bale standing over a free kick, I'd expect him to work the keeper more at least, if not score 3+ free kicks, and even if his pace isn't the same, he has enough turn of pace and trickery that will win those free kicks.

there is no guarantee that any player might struggle "FLOP", every single transfer we can afford could go that way. I watch a lot of football every weekend, and to be honest with you, I don't think Martial is anything special. yes on his day he is special, but those days are not consistent

I'd agree with most of that. And in a scenario where I have to choose one of them for one-off match next week I'd definitely pick Bale. But that's not the deal, it's who do we dig into our transfer kitty to buy and give a 5 year contract to. The total outlay for Bale over that period will probably be an absolute minimum £105m (40 wages + 65 fee) with Martial's more likely around £70m (20+50). At the end of that period Martial will be 27 and entering his prime, potentially one of the top players in the world but even if not then his value will barely have declined if at all, and assuming no major injury issues should fetch at least 50 given age and prior potential. Bale on the other hand will be a week off 34, and unless you're a freak of nature like Ronaldo that usually means things are rapidly winding down, particularly if you're a guy that relies heavily on pace and athleticism like Gareth. His injury problems could have gotten worse, but even if not we're not getting much back from that £65m.

That makes the financial decision a lot starker, ~90 on Bale vs 20 on Martial, which is a big deal when you've got 3 other positions to fill and a stadium to pay off. Basically if you're going with the former you better be damn sure he's worth it, and it was the Bale of 6 years ago he probably would be, but he's not, he's injury riddled and off form which probably explains why the club is more actively pursuing the latter.
 

Spurs' Pipe Dreams

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2011
20,008
32,728
The problem isn't mentioning Rooney, it's discussing his playing record.

If Bale comes back it'll be the first instance of an in-demand player that has willingly decided to take less money to join a former club. The fact that nobody can point me to another one is definitely relevant.

Pretty much every player who left Real Madrid or Barcelona from the 1990's to current times has taken a pay cut, anyone leaving Monaco has taken a real term pay cut as they pay 0 income tax there, players take pay cuts all the time
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
I'd agree with most of that. And in a scenario where I have to choose one of them for one-off match next week I'd definitely pick Bale. But that's not the deal, it's who do we dig into our transfer kitty to buy and give a 5 year contract to. The total outlay for Bale over that period will probably be an absolute minimum £105m (40 wages + 65 fee) with Martial's more likely around £70m (20+50). At the end of that period Martial will be 27 and entering his prime, potentially one of the top players in the world but even if not then his value will barely have declined if at all, and assuming no major injury issues should fetch at least 50 given age and prior potential. Bale on the other hand will be a week off 34, and unless you're a freak of nature like Ronaldo that usually means things are rapidly winding down, particularly if you're a guy that relies heavily on pace and athleticism like Gareth. His injury problems could have gotten worse, but even if not we're not getting much back from that £65m.

That makes the financial decision a lot starker, ~90 on Bale vs 20 on Martial, which is a big deal when you've got 3 other positions to fill and a stadium to pay off. Basically if you're going with the former you better be damn sure he's worth it, and it was the Bale of 6 years ago he probably would be, but he's not, he's injury riddled and off form which probably explains why the club is more actively pursuing the latter.

as I mentioned in another post to you, we don't exactly know what Bale would receive in wages. I know it sounds like madness to think he would come for so much less, but he will more likely get double compared to what he left us on.

he has had fitness issues with RM, and 1, even though the PL is more physical, Le Liga is a lot dirtier.

the amount of merchandise we would sell through buying Bale will destroy the sales we would make signing Martial, and could even land us with a bigger naming rights which would offset the sell on value.

don't remember where I saw it posted but apparently Martial is not 1 of the strongest in putting the effort into training, and he definitely has a problem with being rotated or being used as a sub. to me he is a player that does show a bit more consistency when he has a regular spot, but if that slips so does his performances.
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
Pretty much every player who left Real Madrid or Barcelona from the 1990's to current times has taken a pay cut, anyone leaving Monaco has taken a real term pay cut as they pay 0 income tax there, players take pay cuts all the time

Real actually have a pretty tight wage structure. Until recently players like Isco and Marcelo were on about 60k apiece, which speaks to fact that the draw of Real is often enough in itself to convince players to join without the the offer of a higher wage. Barca did too before their wage structure ballooned in recent years. In any case, often players that leave actually don't see a drop in wages. Iniesta will probably be earning more in Japan, God only knows what Xavi's been getting in Qatar. And even the ones that take a step down generally see an increase in wages, unless they really flop in which case they tend to see out their contract and leave on a free. Fabregas doubled his wages when he was sold to Chelsea, likewise with Ozil when he went to Arsenal, and that's pretty much par for the course so I don't buy that anyone who's left those clubs since the 90s has seen a massive pay drop, quite the opposite in fact. If you can find me anyone that's taken a large wage cut I'd be interested to hear, and even then it won't be nearly in the vicinity of the % reduction that Bale will experience if he comes to us. (As for Monaco, people leaving there are usually taking a step up, so I'm not sure that really applies).

Regardless, that's not really what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about a choice by a player, taking a step down, to pick to a club where he would be offered less wages (because of emotional ties or whatever, so, Spurs) over another club where he'll be offered a lot more (United). Because you know that if Real do look like selling and word gets out that we're offering him 150k, United, Chelsea or whoever will come in for 250k, and as far as I'm aware there isn't a precedent for a player choosing us in that scenario.
 

CantSmileWithoutYou

Well-Endowed Member
May 20, 2015
3,878
15,507
BALE is under contract at Madrid. If he maintains that he doesn't want to leave and they want to sell him, Madrid would have to pay his contract up, or at least some of it.
We wouldn't need to pay him the same as Madrid would still be paying him.

Think Adebayor but with someone who can play football.

:cautious::D
@Hans Gruber.
JUST to throw an earlier point in on Bale's wages and why he would potentially come back for less...
 

Hans Gruber

Active Member
Aug 10, 2017
183
434
also you might be shocked but not everyone might play just for the money. the money he has earnt over the last 5 seasons have set him up for life

Yeh people keep saying this but nobody can point me to an instance of where it's actually happened.
 
Top