- Nov 8, 2004
- 12,656
- 15,222
Why wasn't Erickson playing today?
He is when Eriksen's injured.
yeah 5 questions is too much.
A lot of good points. I watched the game yesterday and felt Paulinho is a shadow of the player we had early in the season ut then maybe he played off instinct and the form he showed for Brazil in the summer. Since then he has had AVB, now Tim and some injuries but he was not used properly on Sunday. I like both Soldado and Adebayor but am not convinced they are a partnership. Dembele really does need to be allowed to run at the opposition from more forward positions and so much needs Sandro4-4-2 does not suit the players that we have. Paulinho does his best work in advanced positions, Dembele needs freedom, and ade and Soldado end up wandering too much in an effort to link play.
I have always been a big lennon fan and although he put a real shift in today he doesn't offer enough going forward at present. We miss eriksen in the team and im hoping that Lamela will Come good and add the creativity that we need.
I think 4-1-4-1 or variations thereof is our best formation.
Why wasn't Erickson playing today?
Re question 2: Yesterday he was everywhere. At one point he was on the right, cutting in outside the box making a run in passed and then the ball was lost for a moment on the left by Ade I think and for some reason who was now on the left? Townsend! This was all within 10 seconds or so, intercepted on the left and won a corner. He's very motivated and hungry and that's a winning combo for me. He did go flat under AVB but take note now, he's everywhere. He's rising in my books. Just my opinion though, others will see it different1. Why do we play with such an absurdly slow tempo ? Are we told to play this way ? It cannot be coincidence, surely ? We look slow, ineffective and generally clueless every week.
2. Can anyone, anywhere, tell me what Townsend provides ? Where I'm sat, he offers absolutely nothing except a lot of aimless running around, down dead ends usually before the inevitably appalling final decision consisting of one of the following: a crap shot, a crap cross or a loss of possession.
In the Prem, not once this season?Whens the last time we hit the net inside the 1st 15 minutes of a match?
2. Can anyone, anywhere, tell me what Townsend provides ? Where I'm sat, he offers absolutely nothing except a lot of aimless running around, down dead ends usually before the inevitably appalling final decision consisting of one of the following: a crap shot, a crap cross or a loss of possession.
1. Why do we play with such an absurdly slow tempo ? Are we told to play this way ? It cannot be coincidence, surely ? We look slow, ineffective and generally clueless every week.
2. Can anyone, anywhere, tell me what Townsend provides ? Where I'm sat, he offers absolutely nothing except a lot of aimless running around, down dead ends usually before the inevitably appalling final decision consisting of one of the following: a crap shot, a crap cross or a loss of possession.
Pace of the game is dictated by the core of the side. We have Dembele and Paulinho there. Neither is good at pinging the ball around. Thus we have a shit tempo to all our play. It doesn't matter how fast your wingers are if they never get the ball in dangerous areas early enough.
Townsend was the one who drove us forward on the break for our goal. A lot to learn but he offers pace, directness and scares fullbacks
I have another question - is Harry Kane really a preferred attacking option ahead of Ericksen?
Great, more sneering, insulting put-downs of our own players when we've won.
With fans like these, who needs opponents?