- Dec 27, 2012
- 4,272
- 9,238
l couldn't agree more
l couldn't agree more
But the point is this. Jack Rodwell is a terrifically talented player, who has been the English equivalent of Sami Khedira. He was very unlucky with injuries and even unluckier that City's riches meant they bought finished players rather than invest in his development. The lad's still only 23 and has the hunger to make something of his promising career. His next move is crucial and for 10 million (which I assume we can make a large chunk performance-related) it seems such a winning move I'm saddened that conventional wisdom seems so against it - indeed I'd suggest that if you don't want us to sign Jack Rodwell, you are a fair part of the reason England do not fulfill their potential at international level.
So there.
He's not really done much to justify a comparison to Khedira, and Jack Rodwell, who chose to sign for the money at Man City, is the fairer part of why England do not fulfill their potential, rather than fans concerned about his stagnation. It is the player and his advisers who took him to City that are driving the narrative of overhyped overpaid English players letting the national team down. I'm not convinced he has the character for what we need, especially compared to a Schneiderlin who has grafted and got to where he is through hard work and skill at a less glamourous club.
Y
Your right there are a few exceptions, but generally I think a lot lose that extra bit of fire, when in there mind they've already reached the top. I think it's different if you buy from another league or the players leave for another league, like Forlan and De Bruyne. A new adventure, new goals etc. I personally don't think Sidwell has reached the level he was at before he got his Chelsea move since then, same with Johnson. Lukaku didn't really get his feet under the table at Chelsea and I'll be interested to see how he does this season now he's permed.
You don't think Glen Johnson has played better since leaving Chelsea?!
I think you overestimate how good Sidwell was when he moved to Chelsea. Even at the time, people were confused as to why on Earth they wanted him as he was a good player but nothing that special.
You mention Lukkaku not having much of a look in at Chelsea but neither has Rodwell. I don't want Rodwell, as I've said, but I certainly wouldn't write him off.
Sorry i thought you meant Adam Johnson. It's just my opinion on the majority of players losing that 5% edge. Like I said of course there'll be a couple but there's definitely far far more who's performances have dwindled off would you not agree. It's not an exact science and if you disagree, cool. Regarding Glen johnson I think going from Chelsea to Liverpool is a big challenge for a player, especially a young one. Weather we like it or not there far bigger than us and Chelsea. Lukaku is a bit of a different situation than Rodwell as he's been pretty much out on loan since he's been there.
He's not really done much to justify a comparison to Khedira, and Jack Rodwell, who chose to sign for the money at Man City, is the fairer part of why England do not fulfill their potential, rather than fans concerned about his stagnation. It is the player and his advisers who took him to City that are driving the narrative of overhyped overpaid English players letting the national team down. I'm not convinced he has the character for what we need, especially compared to a Schneiderlin who has grafted and got to where he is through hard work and skill at a less glamourous club.
10 mil for him? Way overpriced, even in this market.
And some still argue English players aren't overpriced
You've misunderstood me. Nothing to do with nationality or else Dier would have costed a fortune. I personally feel its due to the homegrown rule
You've misunderstood me. Nothing to do with nationality or else Dier would have costed a fortune. I personally feel its due to the homegrown rule