I remember a FA cup game we played against Man U when Ramos was in charge, Ohara was fantastic at left back that day, he kept Ronaldo quiet.:up:
Anyone on here who didn't think O'Hara would have been good enough to be a squad player for us, clearly has the old our tenth choice isn't functioning properly abd adequate as a member of our squad if he isn't a Pele-Jennings-Beckinbauer-Terminator hybrid, with a bit of the Heston Blumenthal thrown in. And that really is a ridiculous attitude.
Squad players are there to cover for the first choice. Sure, it would be nice if they could push the first choice for the starting place, but, sadly, anyone who is as good as, say VDV, isn't really going to be happy sitting on the bench. Squad players also fall into two categories. Firstly, there are the specialists, a bench needs a goalkeeper, for instance, and a striker. Given that there are only a finite number of bench places, and even more finite number of substitutions that can be made, this makes the second group even more important. And that second group consists of players who are versatile engough to cover more than one place. A versatile defender comes in handy, as does a versatile midfielder. A striker capable of filling in on the flanks is also worth having. Obviously, being squad players, and being versatile, you have to accept a slight reduction in quality.
In the case of O'Hara, he could cover the left-back, and wing positions, and also provide a bit of bite, but also a bit of offensive quality in central midfield - and chip in with some goals. Unfortunately, he wasn't happy being a squad player - but why any Spurs fan would have been unhappy with him being a squad player if he had been prepared to do so, that's beyond me.