- May 7, 2004
- 42,707
- 78,635
Like signing Udogie and Spence and Sarr and GilNeed our scouts to start doing better. By the time these guys get to be 75-100M players, it’s always going to be too late for us.
Like signing Udogie and Spence and Sarr and GilNeed our scouts to start doing better. By the time these guys get to be 75-100M players, it’s always going to be too late for us.
Neither Liverpool nor Chelsea are owned by a country!We are competing though? Top 4 last season and aiming for at least that this season. Considering we aren't owned by a country like several of our competitors I'd say we are doing just fine.
Try telling Liverpool fans/Klopp that they invest right now!Neither Liverpool nor Chelsea are owned by a country!
They’re owned by investment groups… who invest!
There is only ever one thing to tell Liverpool fans: Fuck offTry telling Liverpool fans/Klopp that they invest right now!
And why would he only want spurs if he has the whole footballing world at his feet. You put too much faith in players. Even Kane wanted to leave us. Yet you think lenglet or Bastoni will be desperate to play for us over one of the elite trophy winning juggernauts of World footballAsset has a voice mate. If he only wants Spurs then no, he doesn’t go to the highest bidder.
But that isn't the way to build the squad. You don't try and just sign somebody because they're better than the worse you have, you try and sign players better that are better than what you have i.e in this instance, we need to sign somebody who is better than Davies and Lenglet in that role. Just signing people for the sake of it because they edge out Tanganga is a waste of resources.
Maybe you should of started supporting us earlier then? I’m 46 and I’ve seen us lift a couple ?I get that, but I’m 40 in November and I’m worried I’ll die before we win anything.
Did we have an obligation on Romero? Not sure, but others will confirm. Out of interest what do you think was the main objective for the club this preseason and are you happy with what we did in the transfer market?
We went for a smart and stable summer and I'm fully here for that.
You bring up Ndombele who is our record signing. Fairly recent proof from us that just spending money on players isn't always the right thing. They've gotta be the right fit and profile. Before that we spent on Sanchez as our record signing and again... spending lots money =/= mean we are gonna get the best players.
Looking at our rivals, a lot of us can see the money Man Utd have spent and general consensus is that they've MASSIVELY overspent. Arsenal have had a very good window but like us, have a few places they still need to improve on. Chelsea still don't have a striker. Liverpool are going through an injury crisis and generally seem to be lacking depth in their CM. So its only country backed Man City who seem to be spending and have a squad that seems pretty well stocked.
Sure, I think our squad could do with a few more additions and want us to add a few, but I also don't want us to spend for the sake of spending. I think none of us here were saying we should spend 90mil on Gvardiol, Bastoni just isn't gonna happen seemingly. We've had a few other CBs we've looked at but ultimately I'd imagine a lot seem like more shorter terms buys than long term (at least what's possible right now). Thus we got Lenglet as a short term (loan) who could possibly be more if it all clicks.
As for what the majority of our fanbase was screaming for... is this the same fanbase that screams at every single starting lineup? Or wants Spence to be starting a lot cause there were a lot of fans on here who were VERY Pro-Spence when we were signing him and were suggesting he walks into our first team. No offence to us but, myself included, the majority of our fanbase are idiots. Lovely idiots but idiots nonetheless.
It's a bit of a reach to call Perisic and Bissouma "decent" to try and make the window sound more shit I think that we were crying out for a top quality LWB and CM also, given Winks, Ndombele and Lo Celso were deemed surplus. I think having an expectation, especially at Spurs, that we can solve every position in one window is setting yourself up for a fall from the outset imo.
But lenglet is a stop gap and doesn't appear to be a clear upgrade on Davies so why sign him going by your squad building logic. Bastoni was clearly first choice. Not obtainable. Skriniar is obtainable for example. Bremer was obtainable. Martinez was obtainable. Forfana was obtainable. Koulibaly was obtainable. The point is we needed 2 CBs we have bought in 1 stop gap loan. Yet this is being excused. Why is our transfer business at CB acceptable.
So which "exceptional" signing could we have made? Based on everything we've seen on the market this window we've done quite well. There aren't many purchases other teams have made that we should be jealous of.Perisic is 33. However he is very good. Untested in the league and could be some concerns over motivation and how long he has in the tank. Esp in a conte system. I'm not going to say he's an exceptional buy as there isn't the longevity there. Cucurella for example would have been a very good buy as could have been LB for the next 7-8 years.
Bissouma is again a good signing. However he doesn't offer us anything majorly different from what we had. PEH tops the charts in tackles ball recoveries and passages of play that lead to a shot. Bentancur is very good positionally and calmness our midfield requires. He's also disciplined in the press and the two have decent understanding. Now bissouma might prove to be a massive upgrade. But no one can say that he defo is. He's not an assist or goal machine. bentancur has 2 more assists than him in 90 less games and only 1 less goal contribution overall and PEH had 6 more goal contributions in 40 less games.
Same as richarlison is a good signing but he's back up. So can't be called an exceptional or great signing when his primary function is back up. Decent signings are still good things they are just not exceptional signings
So in summary:Perisic is 33. However he is very good. Untested in the league and could be some concerns over motivation and how long he has in the tank. Esp in a conte system. I'm not going to say he's an exceptional buy as there isn't the longevity there. Cucurella for example would have been a very good buy as could have been LB for the next 7-8 years.
Bissouma is again a good signing. However he doesn't offer us anything majorly different from what we had. PEH tops the charts in tackles ball recoveries and passages of play that lead to a shot. Bentancur is very good positionally and calmness our midfield requires. He's also disciplined in the press and the two have decent understanding. Now bissouma might prove to be a massive upgrade. But no one can say that he defo is. He's not an assist or goal machine. bentancur has 2 more assists than him in 90 less games and only 1 less goal contribution overall and PEH had 6 more goal contributions in 40 less games.
Same as richarlison is a good signing but he's back up. So can't be called an exceptional or great signing when his primary function is back up. Decent signings are still good things they are just not exceptional signings
Do you really believe that? It's ALWAYS next summer. It was supposed to be this summer....
Naughty naughty, don’t you start trying to confuse things with your educationSo in summary:
Almost sounds silly when you write it out doesn’t it?
- Our world class lwb, best in Serie A last season, isn’t a great signing because he won’t be our lwb in seven years time;
- Our top-10-in-the-PL midfielder isn’t a great signing because he’s only excellent at the things our manager wants our midfielders to do;
- And our 15-goal-per-season rotation striker isn’t a great signing because golden boot winner Heung-Min Son might be a better player.
Like signing Udogie and Spence and Sarr and Gil