this is spurs that's why, we always had to drop down to third choice except in exceptional circumstances , chances is walker wouldn't be replaced
Kyle Walker
- Thread starter Snarfalicious
- Start date
SpursDave88
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 2,193
- 5,831
This would be worth a lot more to us than the money in my opinion. Certainly more than Walker today minus a years depreciation, even is we let him rot in the reserves for a season.
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,894
- 130,529
I can't see us letting Walker go until we have already purchased a replacement. If we can't find a suitable replacement, then we won't sell him.
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,894
- 130,529
We have them by the balls now. They'll either have to pay an extortionate fee, or we'll keep him.
Blackrat1299
Well-Known Member
- Jan 8, 2006
- 5,368
- 6,404
The man that gave Crouch the header to put us in the CL
Blackrat1299
Well-Known Member
- Jan 8, 2006
- 5,368
- 6,404
I bet walkers first comment when he read that was................oh vey!
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,439
- 63,522
We really should not sell to them now more then ever
For the love of Spurs
Well-Known Member
- Mar 28, 2015
- 3,452
- 11,279
Don't get why they care it's not their money it's some Arab prince's.
For the love of Spurs
Well-Known Member
- Mar 28, 2015
- 3,452
- 11,279
Plus Patrick Roberts.
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,687
- 104,969
I like the thought but I don't think completely pissing them off is a good idea. They'll just try to unsettle our players every year after that as revenge.
GetSpurredOn
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2006
- 5,022
- 8,922
My concern would be Levy turns this into a pissing contest, demands an exorbitant fee, which City eventually agree to but too late in the window for us to get an adequate replacement, but Levy still sells because he can't resist the offer on the table.
All if's, but's and maybe's though.
All if's, but's and maybe's though.
hughy
I'm SUPER cereal.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 31,940
- 57,197
£60m for Walker or £20m for the pair?
Keep let's not strengthen the enemy!
KILLA_SIN
Well-Known Member
- May 24, 2008
- 7,956
- 14,696
Said this last week
TC18
Lurker
- Jan 27, 2011
- 540
- 1,720
What a bunch of ameateurs City are. Who in their right mind, would release both of their RBs then get into negotiations with Levy of all people. Literally more money than sense.
Personally I would rather keep him if he was going to another team in the Prem, plus we have no reason to sell.
I can’t see us re-investing his entire fee, like with Bale, especially with wimmer and sissoko still to sell. What’s the point in strengthening a rival and having some money in the bank.
Obviously he will be sold though, I imagine Trippier will step up and rightly should be given the chance.
Personally I would rather keep him if he was going to another team in the Prem, plus we have no reason to sell.
I can’t see us re-investing his entire fee, like with Bale, especially with wimmer and sissoko still to sell. What’s the point in strengthening a rival and having some money in the bank.
Obviously he will be sold though, I imagine Trippier will step up and rightly should be given the chance.
GetSpurredOn
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2006
- 5,022
- 8,922
Depends on the needs of the squad.
If Wimmer goes, most of any fee received will likely go on a replacement if media reports are to be believed, maybe even more money will need to be allocated, given Mawson and Gibson quoted at £20-30m.
If Sissoko goes, then Barkley is the main name in the frame and would likely cost more than Sissoko brings in.
Add in the rumoured £20m+ for Pereira, plus Lopez and Foyth fees, and suddenly we're eating into that Walker fee.
Would the fees received for Carroll, Bentaleb, N'Jie and Fazio not be factored in new recruits?
Similar threads
