- Aug 20, 2003
- 9,268
- 11,316
Bloody hell, I haven't seen the incident but to not increase a ban on that seems ridiculous.
Bloody hell, I haven't seen the incident but to not increase a ban on that seems ridiculous.
1100. Posted byDeggsyR
on4 hours ago
What time is the march and virgil starting? Mane is innocent t shirts available soon.
I dont like the analogy as Mane was concentrating on the ball(so therefor so busy looking at the road, he didnt see the pedestrian running on the road)I like Raphael Honigstein's driving analogy. If you're caught speeding you get a little fine and three points, but if you were speeding and hit someone you'd be in big trouble. Mane was speeding, while looking at his phone and hit someone.
It's not a case of hating Liverpool, I think everyone on here would agree that even if it was one of our players it's should have been a retrospective five game banFrom the Comments section of this report.
LoL
Also, reading further in (I know...it's like being mesmerized), the Mickeys really do seem to believe that all the comments against Mane could only be made by United fans. It's like they have no awareness that the rest of the footballing world hates them too!
Especially if that player was Sissoko.It's not a case of hating Liverpool, I think everyone on here would agree that even if it was one of our players it's should have been a retrospective five game ban
1067. Posted bySuarezShouldBeKnighted
on5 hours ago
So basically;
All the fatties, oldies, fergie funded fa, crybaby armchair fans, mancs, bitters - agree with red and ban
People who've actually play the game, including most of the ex professional premier league players & hard men who don't act dead when they have a cut - 3 games too long
Also the commenters posting 'always the victims never their fault should be ashamed!!
Regardless which club mane belongs too this is a travesty for the modern game, with this it says if you go in for a 50/50 challenge that could endanger a player then u will get auto red card.
Sorry any 50/50 challenge can be pretty dangerous and it usually means both players have put themselves in a dangerous position.
Ederson won't change,eventually hurt himself a lot worse than a cut cheek.
1055. Posted byThom1975
on5 hours ago
Keeper use to be hard and would of wiped Kante out, it isn't Kante fault that this keeper decided to go head first with his fist out like Superman. Neville, Grobbler, Coral would of gone in studs up like Bruce Lee enter the dragon style!
1026. Posted byLFCFreer
on5 hours ago
The stupid baby keeper dived for goodness sake. Look at the replays showing him rolling around like a pathetic wimp. A proper footballer would have got up and got on with it and realized the challenge was all inthe spirit of the game. Mane was right to go for the ball, it's just a shame the brainless keeper decided to run intohis foot to cheat Mane into a red card The cheat keeper should be banned
1022. Posted bywedontcarrybottles
on6 hours ago
Of course we lost the appeal
Why should we be surprised with hysterical pundits and uneducated mancs like those in here around
968. Posted byBill
on6 hours ago
It's the referee that should be banned disgraceful decision as bad as the ref in Africa who has just been banned for life IMHO.
898. Posted byAntony
on12 Sept 2017 15:59
I'm glad we lost the appeal. I am a L'pool fan and appealing the ban is ridiculous. There was no malice, but karate kicking someone's face is dangerous and we should just have sucked in the punishment. Appealing makes us look petty.
He knew Ederson was there, otherwise he wouldn't have challenged for the ball 6ft in the air, he would have run onto it and controlled it as it dropped, so in the analogy, he knows the pedestrian is running onto the road.I dont like the analogy as Mane was concentrating on the ball(so therefor so busy looking at the road, he didnt see the pedestrian running on the road)
Also if mane hit someone whilst speeding and looking at his fan, he would be looking at prison time
I like that this one couldn't even tell which 'random black guy' plays for his team yet he is still aggrieved.From the Comments section of this report.
Thom1975
on5 hours ago
Keeper use to be hard and would of wiped Kante out, it isn't Kante fault that this keeper decided to go head first with his fist out like Superman. Neville, Grobbler, Coral would of gone in studs up like Bruce Lee enter the dragon style!
Good to get Phil Thompson'stake, though
Considering the hatred I would have expected a 4th option along the lines of "Didn't see it but it's a Pool player so of course".A thread on Red Cafe titled, "Sadio Mane, was that a red card?"
With the following poll question and 3 options...
Was it a red card?
1. Yes 235 vote(s) 37.8%
2. Definitely 114 vote(s) 18.4%
3. Absolutely 272 vote(s) 43.8%
...and just letting slip that Mane was being a right Kante!I like that this one couldn't even tell which 'random black guy' plays for his team yet he is still aggrieved.
I dont agree personally, he knew Ederson was coming out hence why he tried to control it early but imo he wasnt aware he was so closeHe knew Ederson was there, otherwise he wouldn't have challenged for the ball 6ft in the air, he would have run onto it and controlled it as it dropped, so in the analogy, he knows the pedestrian is running onto the road.
From the comment section:
Have you met any LPool fans?Pool fans clearly haven't realised that the reason Ederson went for it with his head is because - shock horror - he got there first and didn't need to throw his boot out.
Mane lost the 50/50, planted his boot in Ederson's face, and has been duly punished appropriately. End of discussion.