- Apr 1, 2005
- 41,363
- 74,893
I think you mistakenly think he would have LIKED to have shaken their hands but didn't for reasons of pragmatism. I beg to differ.
That is possible also.
I think you mistakenly think he would have LIKED to have shaken their hands but didn't for reasons of pragmatism. I beg to differ.
Does the average Spurs fan care about this?
I'm way above average and I couldn't give a shit. Even the few dick heads that might have made an issue would soon have forgiven him if he played half as well for us as he has for the Mickies.
Yeah, on his cockWas @Houdini wearing it at the time?
According to the same site we were paying Adebayor £101,000 per week.http://www.totalsportek.com/money/liverpool-player-salaries/
Seems a pretty good site, ive been looking it up for a while.
He's not talking about getting stick off of spurs fans. He's talking salah getting shit off of isis and the like for shaking hands with an israeli player.
According to the same site we were paying Adebayor £101,000 per week.
http://www.totalsportek.com/money/tottenham-player-salaries/
By who?Was that not subsidised though?
Are you sure about that? Salah refused to shake hands with Israeli players when he was at Basel.
Quite what Isis has to do with it I don't know.
CitehBy who?
There was some talk that he felt pressured by islamic extremists.Are you sure about that? Salah refused to shake hands with Israeli players when he was at Basel.
Quite what Isis has to do with it I don't know.
Maybe when he was on loan but after we bought him they weren't.Citeh
He is saying that if salah had shaken hands with them he'd have gotten shit over it.
You have some nutters in the middle east who might have viewed him as a traitor.
There was some talk that he felt pressured by islamic extremists.
What makes you so certain?Maybe when he was on loan but after we bought him they weren't.
The same scum paper says that city were paying him £75,000 per week, on top of the £100,000 a week we were paying him.What makes you so certain?
exactly, with all sorts on conflicting stories, what makes you so certain?The same scum paper says that city were paying him £75,000 per week, on top of the £100,000 a week we were paying him.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-000-Tottenham-despite-not-playing-March.html
I've not heard that Man City were subsidising his wages until today. With every other source I've read we were paying his wages.exactly, with all sorts on conflicting stories, what makes you so certain?
Nobody really knows.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/19334854I've not heard that Man City were subsidising his wages until today. With every other source I've read we were paying his wages.
So Daily Fail vs a variety of other sources.