Bentley would explain the rest then, although would say with most transfers these days, the way is paid and any related bonus payments. Makes it hard to judge and compare.No Bentley. And we didn't pay 15 million for Defoe in any meaningful sense, I'm sure.
Wage bills are a far more telling stat than transfer fees, which is not saying that Spurs haven't underacheived, historically and in the past few seasons.
I Agree that wages can be quite telling, and with spurs generally being well run (business wise), and signing generally younger players, therefore keeping wages lower. Has possibly meant freed up amount in transfer fees. Although with Harry looking at signing more established players, it will be quite interesting to see how they will compare against where we finish this and following seasons.