Reckon they will settle for 50 now and 13 if we win the league and champions league ? or is that only in FM!
Nabil Fekir
- Thread starter Darth Vega
- Start date
Reckon they will settle for 50 now and 13 if we win the league and champions league ? or is that only in FM!
TheAmerican
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2012
- 6,913
- 18,761
It wouldn’t surprise me if Liverpool throw a shit ton of clauses in there. Chelsea seem to just lump the cash.
Having said that, I’d love to have him at this point, knee history and all.
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,374
- 63,225
No that could work you could also have one for winning CL, Caps etc. Anything you can think of.
Spursmatty87
Well-Known Member
- Jul 7, 2016
- 1,918
- 5,046
We haven’t even been linked and people are getting excited.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
But The Sun said we were on alert a month ago ..
matthew.absurdum
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 3,734
- 10,126
Just look at the Kovacic thread tbh. Never have a proper link for a long time
TheAmerican
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2012
- 6,913
- 18,761
Here ya go:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.devonlive.com/sport/liverpool-to-hijack-chelseas-60m-1873358.amp
Liverpool 'to hijack' Chelsea's £60m Nabil Fekir signing, Tottenham bid £25m for Jack Grealish and eye shock Rodriguez move
Oh wait ???
What happened to Bus-Conductor?
absolute bobbins
Am Yisrael Chai
- Feb 12, 2013
- 11,656
- 25,971
Saw Rodriguez, hoped James but knew it would be Jay
scat1620
L'espion mal fait
- May 11, 2008
- 16,382
- 52,858
Westham HAD to spend that amount as their squad was and still might be utter shit. It’s begining to drive me mad the caparison with Spam and scums spending to ours. Some teams needed to spend to be less shit let alone good.
Rant over needed to get that out
Sorry to jump on your post.
Fredo
Realist
- Jun 8, 2018
- 3,961
- 18,036
I hate them as much as you, and I'm not even saying spend £100m, City and Chelsea are splashing the cash and they're not shit either. So it's not about how good/bad the squad is in our case, we have a great squad, but we clearly have our weaknesses in CM and ST which should be addressed. It's just about showing ambition to sign a quality player to improve us.
matthew.absurdum
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 3,734
- 10,126
Imagine members in a transfer thread keep saying that onomah and lesniak are better than any players that we are linked
wrd
Well-Known Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 13,603
- 58,005
Your argument is illogical because we could have spent half their entire spend on one singular player and improved us, that's the point. Nothing to do with who on or how.
fortworthspur
Well-Known Member
- Nov 12, 2007
- 11,248
- 17,550
as soon as we signed him the Scousers would say he is shit.
RichieS
Well-Known Member
- Dec 23, 2004
- 11,916
- 16,436
Ha ha, no way?!
matthew.absurdum
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 3,734
- 10,126
Basically that is happing in the case of Grealish. When we seemed to sign Grealish, Liverpool fans kept saying that he is shit and a championship player at best. Now we seem to miss the chance to sign Grealish. I see a lot of Liverpool fans are congratulating villa that they can keep a gem
fortworthspur
Well-Known Member
- Nov 12, 2007
- 11,248
- 17,550
anyway, one of the immutable laws of football is that Liverpool will always pay too much for a player. If 66mil is too much for them he isnt worth it.
