New Stadium Details And Discussions
- Thread starter fozzi44
- Start date
longtimespur
Well-Known Member
- Sep 10, 2014
- 5,833
- 9,950
Wine Gum
Well-Known Member
- May 14, 2007
- 593
- 2,118
The Planning Application has been submitted for 500 White Hart Lane.
http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=288375
http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=288375
L-man
Misplaced pass from Dier
- Dec 31, 2008
- 9,979
- 51,367
Whats this for?
Lilbaz
Just call me Baz
- Apr 1, 2005
- 41,363
- 74,893
Hoopspur
You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
- Jun 28, 2012
- 6,333
- 9,703
The 'offsite' housing scheme Spurs are committing themselves to, including affordable housing I think.
Mind you, a nice outlook with those storage units and factories adjacent.
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,684
- 104,964
498 surely....
Spursidol
Well-Known Member
- Sep 15, 2007
- 12,636
- 15,834
The Planning Application has been submitted for 500 White Hart Lane.
http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=288375
The front part of this site, alongside White Hart Lane, is the site that was being offered to Archway Steel with planning permission granted for an industrial building as compensation for them moving. Very foolish of them to turn down the offer and appeal against the CPO.
Think this scheme is being built, in part, to rehouse any of the residents from the Love Lane estate who wish to stay in the area (and there are references to how Love Lane representatitives are shaping the design in the documentation).
And in turn the Love Lane estate needs to be demolished for Moselle Square (incorporating the walkway from the revamped WHL station to the new stadium) to be built. So until 500 WHL is built the Moselle Square may not be built is my guess
Last edited:
Spursidol
Well-Known Member
- Sep 15, 2007
- 12,636
- 15,834
http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/AttachmentShowServlet?ImageName=748344
BTW part of the timetable from the original planning documents (section 13.5.7 on page 333)
Think we may be a week or so behind (from 1b and 1c) ?
(nb sorry I cannot copy the table from the doc with the timetable)
BTW part of the timetable from the original planning documents (section 13.5.7 on page 333)
Think we may be a week or so behind (from 1b and 1c) ?
(nb sorry I cannot copy the table from the doc with the timetable)
LeSoupeKitchen
Well-Known Member
- Aug 18, 2011
- 3,107
- 7,642
Lol at the telling of stories about living outside of london in the same patronising enlightened way as you would use when describing a year backpacking around asia.
Of course they have. It's a new stadium and they're riding high. They were always going to sell out the first year. And they've massively discounted loads of seats and season tickets.
In fact, only selling out this stadium only in March, 5 months before they use it, is crap and I'd be worried if I were them.
To plan for a bigger stadium on the back of this is complete craziness.
cliff jones
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 4,094
- 6,668
That's quite impressive if they have. So that's the whole ground minus away fans sold as sts?
Wine Gum
Well-Known Member
- May 14, 2007
- 593
- 2,118
IIRC the 54K was set to keep the viewing distances for all seats within 190m from the further corner flag which is the recommended maximum viewing distance for football. Seats are being sold cheap @ £289 for a season ticket to the fill the 54k capacity so anything above this will need to be even cheaper.
This capacity increase sounds to me like spin in readiness to sell the club.
This capacity increase sounds to me like spin in readiness to sell the club.
