- Aug 28, 2008
- 1,099
- 1,522
They're nice balls though....plus with the cock on top. Mwah.He might not want to see your balls though
They're nice balls though....plus with the cock on top. Mwah.He might not want to see your balls though
The teams of these coaches also had around 40% of possession against better teams. You just need to make some research to learn it. Amorim is more attacking, than defensive coach. It is a statistics. While, he tends to be more defensive against a better side, that's true.Think they had about 32% possession against Arsenal in one of the legs when they were at Home and 41% away against us under conte when we were a low possession side ourselves.
I think from watching them they’re marginally more good to watch than us under Conte but how much of that is down to their small and technical passing and dribbling players vs coaching and tactics?
For me Almorim is too similar to conte, he’s not as bad as Glassner’s 3-4-3 though, his 3-4-3 is just like contes counter attacks focus mainly.
Whereas Naglesman, Slot, Kompany would all play high possession, high pressing, attacking free flowing entertaining football.
I think Almorim is a good young coach but I think we’d get bored unfortunately and that is the last thing we need After the last 3 years.
but might be consultingNot really, rangnick won’t be joining.
I will be dissapointed if its not one of Nagelsmann, De Zerbi or Slot.
Forget statistics then, I’ve watched them play a fair few times, as I said they’re okish to watch but they’re nothing special and I think some of it is down to the type of players they have not just tactics.The teams of these coaches also had around 40% of possession against better teams. You just need to make some research to learn it. Amorim is more attacking, than defensive coach. It is a statistics. While, he tends to be more defensive against a better side, that's true.
Spor looks to have worked in a logical sequence also, video analyst, then scout, now sporting director, worked with good people and in a number of different leagues, certainly an interesting and joined up option to fit with Nagelsmann.
yeah thats nothing, matt law just trying to make something of nothingFind it crazy how £10m seems a hefty fee to have to pay for a manager, when you consider £10m would probably not even get a good championship player nowadays.
Think of how much a manager can change the whole club, it seems a small price to pay imo.
Look at their possession in the CL group stage and against Scum in the Europa. They had lower possession average than both us and Marseille in the group stage.
It is very easy to have possession in Portugal if you are Benfica, Porto or Sporting.
I stand by what I said, if you watch them closely they are very similar to us under Conte, they just have more smaller and technical players who make it look better aesthetically.
He shouldn’t be on our list.
Find it crazy how £10m seems a hefty fee to have to pay for a manager, when you consider £10m would probably not even get a good championship player nowadays.
Think of how much a manager can change the whole club, it seems a small price to pay imo.
Find it crazy how £10m seems a hefty fee to have to pay for a manager, when you consider £10m would probably not even get a good championship player nowadays.
Think of how much a manager can change the whole club, it seems a small price to pay imo.
Find it crazy how £10m seems a hefty fee to have to pay for a manager, when you consider £10m would probably not even get a good championship player nowadays.
Think of how much a manager can change the whole club, it seems a small price to pay imo.
To be honest this opinion seems to come from the media rather than clubs. Probably cause you can't sell a coach and get that money back that way.
I think clubs won't scoff at paying 10-20m for a coach if they are really convinced.
Find it crazy how £10m seems a hefty fee to have to pay for a manager, when you consider £10m would probably not even get a good championship player nowadays.
Think of how much a manager can change the whole club, it seems a small price to pay imo.
I'm guessing our net spend budget excluding Kulu / Porro to be somewhere around £50m without CL.
It's still not an easy market to sell players on our wages outside the PL.
So £10-20m out of our budget may not be prohibitive, but it's not inconsiderable.
There would be a knock on effect on transfer targets.
We'd be wise to put some pressure back on Bayern to haggle that down.