- Apr 30, 2021
- 429
- 2,915
The pay-out to Bayern clause expires end of seasonCouldn’t wrap my head around why we would potentially need a smokescreen when hiring a manager, but I think I might’ve actually clocked it now and it makes some things make a lot more sense.
What if the smokescreen is trying to convince Bayern that we absolutely don’t want Nagelsmann?
It was well publicised early on that Bayern would be looking for a huge payout if a club appointed Nagelsmann (£25 million), but at the same time if nobody signs Nagelsmann then Bayern will have to keep paying him his large wages which is the worst case scenario for them.
My theory is that our goal was to try and convince Bayern that we don’t want Nagelsmann at all, so that they end up coming back to us and informing us that they will no longer look for the £25 million so they can just get him off their books.
This theory is probably the only reasonable explanation for why Spurs would think it would be a good idea to leak to anyone that would listen that we have absolutely zero intention of signing or approaching Nagelsmann.
Then we go on to leak that we’re in very advanced talks with Arne Slot to put even more pressure on Bayern to relent on their demands.
Honestly, I think there’s probably too much media talk about Slot for this theory to actually prove to be any bit true, and if it was true at any stage then surely we’ve gone in too deep on Slot to go back. But found it interesting myself at least so wanted to share it