- Jan 27, 2011
- 12,562
- 43,112
[/QUOTE]
If we were simply trying to extract more value from GLC I'm sure we'd be considering Danjuma as another option.
I still think he is the second CB option, brought in to cover CCB and LCB. I would see him coming in as well as Bastoni, not instead. Torres is quick and can cover the spaces left by Romero and (hopefully) Bastoni well. He organises the defence at Villareal, again another required trait of the CCB in our system. He is fairly passive as a defender, which complements the more aggressive LCB and RCBs in our system and finally he can pick a nice pass to our CMs or WBs. I think he would challenge Dier but probably be backup. At least initially. Good age profile as well being 3 years younger then Dier. Some development areas like 1v1s and could be more physical and clean in the air.
I simply see this as a way to get a decent fee for Lo Celso and a decent CB in return. I would hope no more then Lo Celso+£20m. If we can get £20m or so for Rodon and Tanganga then we have upgraded our CCB and LCB depth with no outlay (given Lo Celso, Rodon and Tanganga aren’t used today).
I might be wrong of course and he is actually the backup to Bastoni which I agree would be dissapointing.
If we were simply trying to extract more value from GLC I'm sure we'd be considering Danjuma as another option.