What's new

PGMOL should apologise to club & fans.

jimtheyid

T'riffic
Apr 16, 2005
13,497
7,235
Ok...

Daws goal is ruled for offside. Correctly IMO as Ade was clearly interfering.

If you look closely, Rose catches the attackers trailing leg before touching the ball. IMO it was a stupid tackle to make anyway. You don't dive in recklessly in the box.

If what OP says is corrects then the third goal shouldn't stand.

Fenavdinho can't be sent of for denying a goal... Because it went in.
 

jimtheyid

T'riffic
Apr 16, 2005
13,497
7,235
Come on Jim. Outplayed yes, but most teams are against this lot. They are a amazing team and should be at 1/2 billion large. However, we were not out of the game. Bad decisions may have cost us. I'm not one to normally moan about them, but for fucks sake, let's have a bit of fairness about it

See my last post.
 

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
But there has to be some rule to do with coming from behind. If even some commentators can clearly see that he got the ball first and still think that it's a penalty, then there is something in the rule book that backs it up.

He come round the side of him not through him, its clearly a fair challenge, and most annoying was the ref gave a corner!
 

gibbospurs

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
5,017
6,661
How does the handball on the line work then? Couldn't the ref of sent him off regardless of whether the ball crossed the line. ?
 

Ian Kane

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2012
572
818
Why are these clowns not wheeled out to do interviews after a game ? You have players still gasping for air being asked questions with the Boss following 5 minutes later so why not the other important part of the match, the officials. Some decisions need explaining and all we get is Dermot Gallager agreeing with them on Sky Sports News the next day.

It's horseshit the amount of protection these buffoons get considering the impact then can have on games.
 

abibgdon yid

Member
Aug 9, 2008
39
47
Whilst I of course feel hard done by by the officials decisons i'm not convinced the disallowed goal and penalty were the game changers everyone suggests. When considered in context they only balanced out 2 poor decisions that went in our favour.

With the disallowed goal the only reason we got the free kick that Dawson subsequently scored from was as a result of a blatant dive from Rose and in the first half I thought City deserved a penalty from Bentaleb handballing with both hands. Only thing I think was unjust was Roses red card.

I dont think we should let the officials decisions blur the fact that there is a huge gulf in class between us and the top of the table at the moment and we have seemed unable to keep the ball effectively or create good chances for some time now and we need some radical fixes now if we arw going to be contenders next year as i really dont think we stand a chance of 4th this year.
 

moomin

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2011
1,950
2,899
hate to be that guy but dawson was offsides.... the red on rose was complete and utter bullshit though
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
An apology lol leave it out.

You forgotten about Bentaleb's handball in the first half, they should have had a penalty then and tbh we were getting a lot of 50/50 calls.

The sending off was indeed harsh though and obviously changed the game but refs and linesman have bad games all the time and we get results in our favour as well.

We need to move on.
 

RButch

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2012
1,414
2,235
Don't be ridiculous. We were outplayed. Once again capitulating when a decision does not go our way.

You lot wouldn't be out of place on RAWK.

Yeah we were outplayed but everything stated is FACT not fiction (by the first post). We were hard done by but who knows what could have happened if the penalty hadn't of happened.
 
Top