Gives me a reason to watch West Brom matches, I personally think he's gonna smack up the Premiership.
I'm absolutely pissed hat he has been loaned out, but at least it wasn't to another Championship club. In regards to fitting Pullis's team, he actually might, despite not being big, he is tenacious, he has an excellent first touch from a long ball and is very dangerous abound the edge of the box, whether that is from a long shop, clever pass or cross. HE is also very good/quicjk at turning with the ball, so can turn defence into attack very well.They also play Sessegnon, who is actually smaller than Pritch.Hope I'm wrong but this seems like a really pointless move. They don't play the type of football - or any football really - we want Pritchard playing. I have doubts he'll get enough game time as well, players like him are seen as luxuries by people like Pullis.
And we could have had him here for the run in to keep legs fresh. He's a great little player who has as much in his locker as an AM as anyone we have here right now, more than some.
I'll be even more annoyed if we've done this just to sweeten a deal for a striker who doesn't fit our system and is a petulant twit to boot.
I am being optimistic (which I know is a curse) but just maybe he will bring or offer a fresh dimension to WBA. And maybe Pulis knows this. Evolution, as with Hughes and Stoke. It's easy, and sometimes lazy, to slag off opponents.
Stoke - Turgid boring largely negative football
Crystal Palace - Not as bad as above but not too far behind
WBA - See Crystal Palace
A leopard can't change it's spots as they say. For the most part Pulis plays physical, unimaginative football. He sets his teams up with the aim not to lose the game rather than trying to win it. Personally I'd rather watch paint dry than ANY team that he manages. But that's just me.
Stoke - Turgid boring largely negative football
Crystal Palace - Not as bad as above but not too far behind
WBA - See Crystal Palace
A leopard can't change it's spots as they say. For the most part Pulis plays physical, unimaginative football. He sets his teams up with the aim not to lose the game rather than trying to win it. Personally I'd rather watch paint dry than ANY team that he manages. But that's just me.
Are Stoke turgid?
Are Stoke turgid?
I think Stoke are changing the way they play at the moment, they're still thuggish at the back but their attacking 4 are tasty, I would probably preferred Pritch to go there than WBA
Hopefully he gets a chance there as I think he is made for the Prem
I was referring to Stoke under Pulis' stewardship. Hughes has done wonders for their style of play & has signed some very exciting players. They are a very different proposition these days thankfully.