3 goals in 6 appearances and he's out of form and needs benching?
LOL, I remember Defoe going on a great goalscoring run and you wanted him out the team as he didn't offer enough other than goals
Oh the cognitive dissonance that this comment should produce. Of course that presupposes certain things. I wonder if you will get a reply. I do appreciate this little nugget. Well done.LOL, I remember Defoe going on a great goalscoring run and you wanted him out the team as he didn't offer enough other than goals
Honest question, do u actually speak like this irl? or is it something you adopt when you're attempting to insult people's intelligence on football forums?Oh the cognitive dissonance that this comment should produce. Of course that presupposes certain things. I wonder if you will get a reply. I do appreciate this little nugget. Well done.
Nope, Esperanto. But seeing as English is the most used I figured when in Rome and all. Would you prefer it with a few more bluds and fams?Honest question, do u actually speak like this irl? or is it something you adopt when you're attempting to insult people's intelligence on football forums?
What was Defoe's great goalscoring run? I don't think he was every hitting rates of 1 in 2, and he was playing as an out and out striker.LOL, I remember Defoe going on a great goalscoring run and you wanted him out the team as he didn't offer enough other than goals
You're ignoring the massive difference in that Defoe's entire career has been built on his ability to do one thing...score goals.Nope, Esperanto. But seeing as English is the most used I figured when in Rome and all. Would you prefer it with a few more bluds and fams?
No insult intended nor implied. Exposure of hypocrisy enjoyed however.
Woah, woah, woah! I didn't write the post, @dontcallme did. And I replied to him as I was interested in whether nicdic would consistently apply his reasoning in calling for Defoe's benching. This is the crux of the debate here as the cry for Son to be utilized in Dele's stead is for this very reason.You're ignoring the massive difference in that Defoe's entire career has been built on his ability to do one thing...score goals.
More nonsense from you I'm afraid fam.
What was Defoe's great goalscoring run? I don't think he was every hitting rates of 1 in 2, and he was playing as an out and out striker.
Oh the cognitive dissonance that this comment should produce. Of course that presupposes certain things. I wonder if you will get a reply. I do appreciate this little nugget. Well done.
Urgh....What happened to 'when in Rome'?Woah, woah, woah! I didn't write the post, @dontcallme did. And I replied to him as I was interested in whether nicdic would consistently apply his reasoning in calling for Defoe's benching. This is the crux of the debate here as the cry for Son to be utilized in Dele's stead is for this very reason.
And what is the defense trotted out by Dele's defenders for his poor play?
I don't believe I ever stated that. Must be some crossed wires. Your objection to my post was for 'exaggeration'. I fully understand your position and we both agree on his poor start. We disagree on the last part as I believe others might provide more of both in his position and I think Poch does as well hence Ross Barkley interest. And again I don't want him sent to China but I would like to see progress in his game.My opinion of Alli is that he offers more than goals. I've replied to you before stating he has a lot of assists and works hard off the ball.
I've never denied he has had a poor start to the season.
Nope, Esperanto. But seeing as English is the most used I figured when in Rome and all. Would you prefer it with a few more bluds and fams?
No insult intended nor implied. Exposure of hypocrisy enjoyed however.
I don't know either of your posting histories, so please don't take this as any kind of a go at you, but it seems a very trivial thing you're picking him up for doesn't it?Hahahaha..
Here, nobody's impressed.
Nope, Esperanto. But seeing as English is the most used I figured when in Rome and all. Would you prefer it with a few more bluds and fams?
No insult intended nor implied. Exposure of hypocrisy enjoyed however.