- Jan 27, 2011
- 26,985
- 61,897
I can only assume you're not a fan of Alli either then because he does this far more than Erik...
He does far more than Lamela in other important areas though.
I can only assume you're not a fan of Alli either then because he does this far more than Erik...
He does far more than Lamela in other important areas though.
Been paying attention to this thread the last few days and its only reminded me why i hate it with the white hot fire of a thousand suns. Christ almighty. Its like now that hes injured and we've hit a purple patch, the inmates run the asylum in here. 'We dont need him, he sucks, yadda, yadda, yadda.' Give it up already. You're making yourselves look worse than you did before.
Hmmm
Yes he scores more goals but his pressing, workrate and general creative play aren't a match for Lamela.
I think both their qualities are equally important to the team. I just don't think it's fair to criticise Lamela for something that Alli is certainly more culpable of but seems to get an easy ride about because he's the current darling of English football.
Wasn't Lamela last season our second top scorer?Alli gets an easier ride for no reason other than he has more end product. That's what football is about no matter how much you wish to romanticise about other elements about.
Wasn't Lamela last season our second top scorer?
I don't care as long as we win the leaguePossibly. Anyway this has gone off on a tangent, I wasn't the one comparing Alli and Lamela, my point is I want to see more from him and that's all really.
Wasn't Lamela last season our second top scorer?
I think it was Kane, Dele, Eriksen, Lamela wasn't it?
Alli gets an easier ride for no reason other than he has more end product. That's what football is about no matter how much you wish to romanticise about other elements about.
You mean last seasons stats which have Lamela scoring / assisting roughly once every 2.5 matches while Eriksen and Alli achieved this better than once every 2 matches in the league?Lol look at last seasons stats. Lamela has plenty of 'end product' - no romanticism there just pure facts.
You mean last seasons stats which have Lamela scoring / assisting roughly once every 2.5 matches while Eriksen and Alli achieved this better than once every 2 matches in the league?
Lamela has decent output, better than players we've had in years gone by and enough to consider him useful to us. He'd probably be a star in a mid table side, for us he's someone who is an option for certain situations but as yet not particularly eye catching other than in fleeting moments.
100% can't understand the detractors he's amazing for us but mostly in areas that don't get him recognised. when he was getting subbed for son it showed to our detriment. At times I couldn't understand why he always got subbed and you could see how disappointed he was with it. Verts or Toby recently commented how much he means to the team and he adapts and learns - http://www.spursfanatic.com/blog/secret-success-erik-lamela/ - a good example of his offensive improvements. Seems some people will never get himBut this goes back to my original point - what he currently lacks in his goal and assist stats he more than makes up in his pressing, intensity and creative play - which he excels at. His other qualities - which are more intangible - are equally important to the overall make up of the team.
Thanks mind was a bit blurry on the details. Judging on the number of replies and disagrees, dislikes, doh's this guy has a cult following.
Alli gets an easier ride for no reason other than he has more end product. That's what football is about no matter how much you wish to romanticise about other elements about.
Good job we ditched Modric then, far less end product than Lamela.