i mean yeah sure, in your head that's exactly what happened.Our scouts recommended Skriniar and KMJ but the baldy twat fucked up both deals. And he will fuck up vdv and Tapsoba deals too
You forgot WimmerThought I would look at the prior years just for context. There is some shit but some quality too.
2015 Alderweireld
2014 Fazio, Dier, Davies (sort of)
2013 Chiriches
2012Vertonghen
2011 Ryan Nelson
2010 Gallas, Khumalo
2009 Bassong
2008 -
We were playing like 60/70 game seasons there would have been plenty time to bed them in.Succession planning is one thing, but if you bring in someone to be the next generation, you have to give them game time in order to improve / mature.
In this high stakes world, its likely they never got much of a run on the team in order to make that step up.
Sadly he turned out to be a bit of a hologwam.You forgot Wimmer
2 wtf ratings, superb. Pretty easy to understand what i was saying but i'll spell it out to you anyway.i mean yeah sure, in your head that's exactly what happened.
It is true though. Well at least in my head as well the poster you are conversing with.2 wtf ratings, superb. Pretty easy to understand what i was saying but i'll spell it out to you anyway.
You've posted a completely unsubstantiated version of events - firstly you apparently know for definite that Spurs scouts recommended these two players, and then you are absolutely sure the reason behind the failure to sign said players was all the chairmans fault. No facts to back it up (and no, even itk on here isn't a FACT). Hence my post. You've basically posted something you believe in your head, with nothing to back it up factually.
Madness is'nt it...especially when you consider that last season we played a defensive set up with 5 at the back.....we will get murdered this season playing Ange's style of football with that dross at the back.This really should have been sorted before pre season, before Maddison, before any other signing. We leaked 60 goals last season and so far we are going into the season with the same back line.
Liverpool will be where we are now, in a couple of seasons. Although the difference with them is that they will probably remedy the situation like they have with their attack and midfield.
which our chairman never does thatThey definitely will. With their attack faltering a bit, Diaz, Nunez, Gakpo. Recently needed to renovate their midfield, Mac Allister., Szoboszlai and soon to be Lavia and this just being in one window. I think they recognise their weaknesses and really move with intent in the window to rectify them in fairness.
Not really, the plan is now to have the ball and put the other team under pressure, last season we caved in so many times because the defence had no one in front of them as an outlet or as protection and as such were under the cosh for most of the game. Do I want better cb's yes do I think the ones we have are as terrible as they showed last season no.Madness is'nt it...especially when you consider that last season we played a defensive set up with 5 at the back.....we will get murdered this season playing Ange's style of football with that dross at the back.
The club just has to see this surely?
I wouldn't give them that amount of credit to be honest. Pool fans certainly don't. They've had the same problem with their midfield as we've had with our defence for about 3 years, they've just now finally got around to sorting it out.They definitely will. With their attack faltering a bit, Diaz, Nunez, Gakpo. Recently needed to renovate their midfield, Mac Allister., Szoboszlai and soon to be Lavia and this just being in one window. I think they recognise their weaknesses and really move with intent in the window to rectify them in fairness.
They definitely will. With their attack faltering a bit, Diaz, Nunez, Gakpo. Recently needed to renovate their midfield, Mac Allister., Szoboszlai and soon to be Lavia and this just being in one window. I think they recognise their weaknesses and really move with intent in the window to rectify them in fairness.
did I? Sorry about that. No intention to mislead. Cheers.You've linked to my quote, but those aren't the words in that quote ... I'd say that's slightly misleading.