- Jun 19, 2008
- 3,461
- 5,287
Emerson only worth… what someone is willing to pay. Not convinced he’s worth £10-15m tbh at the moment.I do remember there been talk of Emerson not being keen on the move to Spurs initially and that it took some convincing from our Brazilian contingent (which might have just been Lucas at the time) to get him onboard with the move. If we don't have a loan deal already lined up that he's happy with then of course the risk becomes that we have 3 RWBs for the second half of the season and Emersons value falls off a cliff as he'll get no game time.
This is however the reality of operating without a proper transfer strategy and by going with slightly risky, but might pay off, signings. Because when you do that a % of them just won't work out. What Spurs fail to realise is that if you go with riskier signings and you don't loan them first to test them out (and sometimes even if you do - Lo Celso), then you will end up winning on some (Kulusevski) and losing on others (Emerson). What you have to do is cut your loses on the ones that don't work out.
So we paid, in this example, about £65m for Kulu and Emerson. Kulu is now worth about £50-60m and Emerson is now worth about £10-15m. So you've ended up with about £60-75m worth of players for £65m. However if you had just bought 1 player at £65m then they might have worked out or might not. So this method reduced the risk overall of your transfer spend. However it does require to you cut your loses on those that don't work out. I think Levy simply doesn't understand that part - we should cut our loses now on Emerson, as there will be takers for £10m-15m (even if it's loan to buy) and then sign Porro. But I imagine we are trying to negotiate both a lower fee for Porro and a higher fee for Emerson all at the same time.