- Jan 8, 2007
- 4,664
- 6,734
Jesus was not really an option. He wanted to be first choice. Kane is better than him so he would have had to play right or left which he is less effective in.I think if we had Jesus we'd have a better chance of winning the league this season. We are short of a number 10 ball player forward type, Jesus would have been the perfect mix of hold up play, on the ball quality, passing and pressing. I just can't believe we couldn't have muscled in on that deal had we not been smarter and working on him for the past year like Arsenal have. They sold Jesus a dream and he bought it.
Haaland is irrelevant somewhat I do agree there but I explained my position in a later post, we overpaid on Richarlison because we didnt quite have a plan and just went for something we knew would fit. Its not worked out badly but its a little wasteful. All those teams that got better players than us were able to because they had been on those deals for months.
Richarlison can play left side or up front and offers more versatility than Jesus in my opinion. Coupled with Kulu, we have a good blend of players and differing skillsets depending on opposition. He was an early purchase in the summer and Conte wanted him.