- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,724
- 16,956
The Kane example doesn't work. Kane was never touted as a wonder kid. The point with Sessegnon is that he was and the supporting evidence is lacking. If you look at the attributes needed to be an elite attacking wide player, they aren't evident in Sessegnon's game. Hence the video's of him producing mind blowing skills, don't exist, in the way they do for Sancho or Hazard etc. It's simply not random which players go on to be world beaters and which don't. They have to have the attributes to support the "potential" claims. You simply won't find the videos of Sessegnon hitting screamers from distance, curling the ball with the outside of his foot through a gap or turning several players inside out, or showing insane acceleration etc. Someone compared his situation now with Gnabry and I showed, the key difference.
I'm not saying he won't go on to be a top LB. I've said he's got the tools and I want him to go out on loan and develop. But watching Gnabry dominate in the CL semi final and think Sessegnon can go the same way is extremely far fetched, as Gnabry had all the tools needed to be an elite attacking player and Sess simply doesn't. Now Marcus Edwards, on the other hand, clearly does have the ability, so he would be a more apt comparison with Gnabry. Edwards couldn't get a game with Norwich, yet it's not implausible to imagine him dominating a CL semi final is a few years, if he can physically develop, which doesn't seem that likely.
Got to remember Sessegnon is only 20 years old. We haven't had a propper look at him yet. Being injured for pre-season and the change of clubs and managers hasn't made it easy. I'd back him to become a solid player for us. Has a great engine, can pass and finish just needs time. Got to remember he scored at Bayern.