- Mar 30, 2015
- 520
- 1,490
People wanted Levy to back the manager, yet when they don't like what he believes in doing you don't want him backed? This is a strange place.
This is where I disagree, we are in a dire situation, where we have only got one striker
People may say well we have youth the reality is that we don't to be honest. Harrison has spent more time as a no.10 than a no.9 and Sterling who I like a lot, just turned 17 last month and isn't having the best season and isn't ready.
I have criticised Levy before for the Saha and Frasier-campbell signings but I would argue they are perhaps what we need a short term option for 6 months that could leave at the end of the season. Shit even Sinclair(just left liverpool) would have been a very good signing.
If Kane is injured, we will be fucked if we don't sign a striker imo
Spot on! He's just saying the right things.I think it is a few thinks, as @fatpiranha said earlier in the thread, to put it out there that we are not desperate and willing to wait for the right player and right price, so we won't be held to ransom, message to Levy that he won't accept a "filler", a message to the fans not to panic, whilst giving the academy players a boost and an incentive. If he really thinks we can rely on Harrison and/or Sterling if Kane was injured, then it is a real concern.
I agree mate they could. We need someone a level above that who is an actual striker. Starting when Harry is tired or coming to to nick us a goal in an important game could be the difference between a cup final and not or top3/4 or not.So you don't think Son, Chadli or NJie could do the same kind of "Saha/Fraser-Campbell" standard job ?
I agree mate they could. We need someone a level above that who is an actual striker. Starting when Harry is tired or coming to to nick us a goal in an important game could be the difference between a cup final and not or top3/4 or not.
Njie is out until the end of March and then he would have to regain fitness/match sharpness. I don't think we will see him until mid April and that would be short appearances off the bench.So you don't think Son, Chadli or NJie could do the same kind of "Saha/Fraser-Campbell" standard job ?
Njie is out until the end of March and then he would have to regain fitness/match sharpness. I don't think we will see him until mid April and that would be short appearances off the bench.
we have one striker, all that rubbish about son and clinton being able to play up front on the evidence isnt true, and i think even poch has admitted this
possible title, cup games and we have one striker who played all through the summer and has hardly had a break
would be madness, but that hasnt stopped us before
Son and N'jie noSo you don't think Son, Chadli or NJie could do the same kind of "Saha/Fraser-Campbell" standard job ?
Son and N'jie no
Im using them as an example but having someone that can play up top would make a big difference.
Chadli has alot of attributes but isn't being tried there so is a mute point.
In our 4231, there is an over reliance on the AM3 and at times they leave our striker to do basically feed off scraps or try make something himself rather always servicing him. However when the above are tried there it seems to get much worse imo
If Kane picks up a knock and we need a striker to do a job I rather rely on an actual striker who can do the role rather than the above running around trying to be a striker but not really troubling
If I had the choice between Pato and one of Son or Chadli starting up front, I rather go with Pato tbh(though it appears chances of getting him on a loan are slim). Even someone like Immobile who was at loan Sevilla and now gone to Torino on loan would have been great imo
Well it hasn't been answered. Why people think we will get a striker this Jan in is beyond me
Not surprised you posted this Larry - considering you'd sign the sun, moon and all the stars if you could.
And Ryan Nelson and Adebayor, in Adebayor's case after his season long loan we decided to give him a contract, look at how that turned out. I'm not in favour of a filler option, with the new scouting team we should be beyond that kind of stuff.One of the players he mentioned hasnt started a U21 game yet and the other has spent more time as an AM than a striker this season
The thing is there is an alternative to the filler option, which is the short term option, like a free or short term loan. It doesnt leave us with a player who we will struggle to get rid of in 6months time but it does cover our striker
We done it before with Saha and campbell
I don't understand why we don't look at strikers in Sth America that we could buy to develop into the next round of star forward(s). Places like Uruguay, Columbia, Argentina have loads of talent that may not be the solution for right now, but could be in 2-3 years. Work permit issues etc I know, but there is a way around all that crap
Buying strikers is a whole different world to defenders and midfielders. We need a different approach
I'd certainly be upset, I want us to win a trophy, going out of two competitions early on would be shit, losing to Leicester twice in a season would also be shit.I don't think that'll be a problem lol.
To be honest I hope it doesn't.
Given the league position we are in would anyone be that upset if we were out of the cups and only concentrating on the league?
My biggest concern is we try and juggle too many balls and drop the lot.
edit- need a proven goal scorer imo. Anything less and we'll drop them balls.
And yet it'll be a balls up!! Strange.
Yellow.............