- May 28, 2013
- 7,365
- 20,242
I actually don't think he meant "No" to the question "has there been a recent change then?". (Of course everyone here has watched the clip and we all interpret his response slightly differently, hence the differing opinions on what he meant when he said what he said.)
But my interpretation was he firstly said "sorry?" then said "no no - that's not a question for me", which I took to mean "you have to ask my boss, Daniel Levy".
He also says "maybe the club needs to change my job description now, because my job now is to coach the team".
Interestingly - when his job title changed in 2016, he did admit that in truth his role wouldn't change, but he made it clear he felt more like a manager than a Head Coach anyway as he had responsibilities beyond coaching that he shared with Daniel Levy, but that Levy always had the final say:
Cartilage Free Captain article (2016)
And yet now, he quite clearly appears to say this is not the case. He claims to have no idea (or say) on who is leaving, who is staying and what is happening with player contracts. Whether this is true or not, it seems to be how he feels and he's making no bones about making this public.
Finally, whether he meant this as a completely neutral comment on how things are done, or with some aspirations of what he wanted, he allegedly made the comments that Guardiola and Klopp enjoy "complete control" over their clubs, unlike Spurs, Chelsea or Arsenal (here).
So, I don't think he is simply frustrated, I think he's actually coming across as quite pissed off, in my opinion.
I see it differently.
I am certain that he still discusses these things with Levy.
Of all his faults, Levy has never pretended to know about football at the playing level. That's why he's employed directors of football in the past. That's why he set up that transfer "panel" with Pochettino.
But I'm also sure that once Pochettino has talked to Levy about which players he wants to keep and which he doesn't mind losing, and all the permutations, he then leaves it up to Levy to do the negotiations, which to my personal knowledge can be very protracted.
At this stage it is no doubt true that Pochettino doesn't know every detail about where things stand on negotiations. It's not his job to do so, and never has been. But that doesn't mean he has no say in these matters. Of course he does.
The same with transfers; I very much doubt that Levy would buy a player without Pochettino having given him the nod. Levy is not reckless with money, that's for sure, so why wouldn't he consult the one expert who's no only close to hand and has no conflict of interest, but who he's already paying?
So there's a very clear division of responsibility, but it's simplistic in the extreme (in my view) to believe this means that Pochettino has no say in these matters. Of course he does, as he always has, and there's no reason to suppose that this has changed.
I read the comment about changing his job title as a jibe at the press for consistently misunderstanding his job.
And I can see no evidence that he's pissed off with the club.