What's new

Pochettino: Tottenham title could be 10 years away

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
I'm gonna stick to the optimistic route & say he's simply stated these words to fire the boys up & stem the talk of being title contenders from the media.

Under the radar is where we perform best.
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
This sort of comment is utter crap.
Money wins titles.
If ANY club has a sugar Daddy come in and spend spend spend then they WILL win the title within 2 or 3 years.
Chelsea and Man City prove it.
5 years, 10 years, 100 years wont make any fkin difference while there are 4 huge clubs out there spending 10 times more than you.
By the same token if the money pulled out of City and Chelsea they wouldn't be anywhere near winning a title. Their 'mentality' isnt gonna keep them in the top 4 let alone win a title.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,425
38,457
This sort of comment is utter crap.
Money wins titles.
If ANY club has a sugar Daddy come in and spend spend spend then they WILL win the title within 2 or 3 years.
Chelsea and Man City prove it.
5 years, 10 years, 100 years wont make any fkin difference while there are 4 huge clubs out there spending 10 times more than you.
By the same token if the money pulled out of City and Chelsea they wouldn't be anywhere near winning a title. Their 'mentality' isnt gonna keep them in the top 4 let alone win a title.
Hopefully within that period the stadium income will start to be reflected in the transfer budget. For sure money is important but mentality does play a part too. We know we can beat the better teams so when we do lose to a Burnley, knowing that we do have better quality players then mentality must play a part in that.
 

Jenko

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2004
5,298
4,188
This sort of comment is utter crap.
Money wins titles.
If ANY club has a sugar Daddy come in and spend spend spend then they WILL win the title within 2 or 3 years.
Chelsea and Man City prove it.
5 years, 10 years, 100 years wont make any fkin difference while there are 4 huge clubs out there spending 10 times more than you.
By the same token if the money pulled out of City and Chelsea they wouldn't be anywhere near winning a title. Their 'mentality' isnt gonna keep them in the top 4 let alone win a title.

Money does win titles but I disagree that the comment is bullshit. Theres a reason we drop points at crucial stages throughout the last 3 years. Whenever we are touching distance from the top we have done it. Comments like @coopsieyid above that we play better 'under the radar'. It's because of our mentality. We cant expect to win anything under the radar but we have shown we can challenge the money club's already.

I agree Poch needs to focus on the mentality and I think he's addressing the right thing at this stage. It's good to hear him moaning about the fixtures and the ref, even if he is wrong sometimes. And hopefully we put Chelsea to the sword tonight and stick the boot in when they're down, cos true winners take pleasure in that.
 

Jadon Benjamin

Active Member
Aug 30, 2013
601
544
I'm gonna stick to the optimistic route & say he's simply stated these words to fire the boys up & stem the talk of being title contenders from the media.

Under the radar is where we perform best.
Although I agree with you this is where we are falling short. Twice we came within two points of city and pool and we blew it. Against Wolves and Burnley. Teams we really should be beating comfortably with all due respect. We are lacking a certain cutting edge. We need to regain that edge whilst we still have a squad that can arguably compete for the title.
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
Although I agree with you this is where we are falling short. Twice we came within two points of city and pool and we blew it. Against Wolves and Burnley. Teams we really should be beating comfortably with all due respect. We are lacking a certain cutting edge. We need to regain that edge whilst we still have a squad that can arguably compete for the title.


The only response I can give to this had already been stated countless times by others, buddy.

If Man City want to win the league, they should be comfortably beating the likes of Newcastle & Leicester, but they've lost against them. Liverpool, if they want to win the title, should have won more than the 2 or 3 league games they've won in 2019, but they haven't.

It is indeed unlikely that we'll win the league but, the fact is, in the PL, there is always a chance that these clubs that should be beaten will end up getting a surprise victory.
 
Last edited:

Everlasting Seconds

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2014
14,914
26,616
The it response I can give to this had already been stated countless times by others, buddy.

If Man City want to win the league, they should be comfortably beating the likes of Newcastle & Leicester, but they've lost against them. Liverpool, if they want to win the title, should have won more than the 2 or 3 league games they've won in 2019, but they haven't.

It is indeed unlikely that we'll win the league but, the fact is, in the PL, there is always a chance that these clubs that should be beaten will end up getting a surprise victory.
I believe the point that was being made was not to isolate the supposed quality of the opponent, but also the possible importance of the specific match. Issue isn't that we lost to Burnley full stop. Issue is that we lost to a team of lessor quality in a match that was the match to win in terms of title run or no title run. It's not about the ability to beat a non-prestigious team. It's the ability to go, "Fuck this is an important match, we'll absolute nail it".
 
Last edited:

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,146
46,140
He has a point. Teams can lose a football match, but after getting back into the game at 1-1 a title winning team goes on to win that match.

I do find it amusing though how Poch’s predictions keep going backwards and expectations continually lowered.

At some point he also has to point the spotlight on himself. The selection of Foyth over Sanchez was a big error on his part.
 
Last edited:

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,425
38,457
He has a point. Teams can lose a football match, but after getting back into the game at 1-1 a title winning team goes on do win that match.

I do find it amusing though how Poch’s predictions keep going backwards and expectations continually lowered.

At some point he also has to point the spotlight on himself. The selection of Foyth over Sanchez was a big error on his part.
Absolutely. That's the point really - there is no single issue or remedy. All of the points made on here have been valid to a greater or lesser extent.
 

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
I agree with one of the other poster's who said it's unlikely we will the league possibly never for many reasons stated above, however I think levy and co will want the club to continue finishing top four for the next 5-10 year's to help pay off the stadium.
We probably become similar to arsenal in that CL place year in year out but not actually achieve fuck all else.
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
I believe the point that was being made was not to isolate the supposed quality of the opponent, but also the possible importance of the specific match. Issue isn't that we lost to Burnley full stop. Issue is that we lost to a team of lessor quality in a match that was the match to win in terms of title run or no title run. It's not about the ability to beat a non-prestigious team. It's the ability to go, "Fuck this is an important match, we'll absolute nail it".
Agree which is what makes the decision to play 5 defenders and start Foyth imo fkin stupid but there you go. Whats done is done.
 

tototoner

Staying Alert
Mar 21, 2004
29,402
34,111
we it has only been 58 years since the last time we won the league, no point rushing anything
 
Top